File:A case study of the Advanced Amphibious Assault Vehicle (AAAV) program from a program management perspective (IA acasestudyofadva1094513572).pdf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Go to page
next page →
next page →
next page →

Original file(1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 7.83 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 217 pages)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary[edit]

A case study of the Advanced Amphibious Assault Vehicle (AAAV) program from a program management perspective   (Wikidata search (Cirrus search) Wikidata query (SPARQL)  Create new Wikidata item based on this file)
Author
Adams, Scott R.
image of artwork listed in title parameter on this page
Title
A case study of the Advanced Amphibious Assault Vehicle (AAAV) program from a program management perspective
Publisher
Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School
Description

This research effort focused on the program management issues of the U.S. Marine Corps' Advanced Amphibious Assault Vehicle (AAAV) Program. The research answered the primary question of what were the critical program management decisions during the early phases of the program and how would an analysis of these decisions affect the future of the AAAV program. Interviews were conducted with key personnel from the AAAV office and General Dynamics Land Systems. Additionally, program documents and other relevant literature were reviewed. The key findings of the research effort concluded that reducing technical risk early in program is critical; Program Managers (PMs) must influence system design as early as possible; physical collocation of Government and contractor personnel facilitates the implementation of integrated Product and Process Development (lPPD) and Integrated Product Teams (lPTs); the use of IPPD and IPTs has helped the AAAV program but personnel need to be trained before implementation; adopting an evolutionary acquisition strategy will help prevent component obsolescence prior to fielding; and PMs should use special contracting provisions to incentivize contractors to reduce total ownership costs.


Subjects:
Language English
Publication date March 1999
publication_date QS:P577,+1999-03-00T00:00:00Z/10
Current location
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink
Accession number
acasestudyofadva1094513572
Source
Internet Archive identifier: acasestudyofadva1094513572
https://archive.org/download/acasestudyofadva1094513572/acasestudyofadva1094513572.pdf
Permission
(Reusing this file)
Approved for public release, distribution unlimited.

Licensing[edit]

Public domain
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code. Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current20:17, 13 July 2020Thumbnail for version as of 20:17, 13 July 20201,275 × 1,650, 217 pages (7.83 MB) (talk | contribs)FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection acasestudyofadva1094513572 (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #5069)

Metadata