File:A case study of Magnavox as a model for Process Oriented Contract Administration Services (PROCAS) implementation (IA acasestudyofmagn1094531301).pdf
Original file (1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 4.11 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 107 pages)
Captions
Captions
Summary[edit]
A case study of Magnavox as a model for Process Oriented Contract Administration Services (PROCAS) implementation
(   ) |
||
|---|---|---|
| Author |
Dollase, Steve. |
 |
| Title |
A case study of Magnavox as a model for Process Oriented Contract Administration Services (PROCAS) implementation |
|
| Publisher |
Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School |
|
| Description |
This thesis examines the implementation of the Process Oriented Contract Administration Services (PROCAS) program at Magnavox Electronic Systems Company in Fort Wayne, Indiana, one of the seven pilot sites for the program. PROCAS is a Defense Contract Management Command (DCMC) initiative designed to apply the tools of total quality management, including cross-functional teaming, continuous process improvement, and empowerment, to the contract administration process. PROCAS supports DCMC's performance based management philosophy, which strives to allocate resources based on assessed contractor risk. The study describes the development, objectives, and components of the PROCAS program. Implementation of PROCAS at Magnavox is analyzed to determine the factors that contributed to the success of the initiative. Barriers to implementation and problems with the implementation are identified and discussed. The benefits of PROCAS for both the Government and Magnavox are analyzed. The study concludes that the implementation was successful, and recommends continuing support of PROCAS by DCMC. Potential areas for expansion of the PROCAS philosophy are identified. The study shows the value of PROCAS in facilitating a total quality transformation of an organization, and in improving the efficiency and effectiveness of Government contract administration. Subjects: |
|
| Language | English | |
| Publication date | December 1995 | |
| Current location |
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink |
|
| Accession number |
acasestudyofmagn1094531301 |
|
| Source | ||
| Permission (Reusing this file) |
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. As such, it is in the public domain, and under the provisions of Title 17, United States Code, Section 105, may not be copyrighted. | |
Licensing[edit]
|
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code.
Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.
|
 |
| This file has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights. | ||
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
| Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| current | 20:23, 13 July 2020 |  | 1,275 × 1,650, 107 pages (4.11 MB) | Fæ (talk | contribs) | FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection acasestudyofmagn1094531301 (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #5081) |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file: