File:A case study- Acquisition Reform and the Joint Primary Aircraft Training System (JPATS) program (IA acasestudyacquis109459296).pdf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Go to page
next page →
next page →
next page →

Original file(1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 4.44 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 121 pages)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary[edit]

A case study: Acquisition Reform and the Joint Primary Aircraft Training System (JPATS) program   (Wikidata search (Cirrus search) Wikidata query (SPARQL)  Create new Wikidata item based on this file)
Author
McKinley, Kenneth W.
image of artwork listed in title parameter on this page
Title
A case study: Acquisition Reform and the Joint Primary Aircraft Training System (JPATS) program
Publisher
Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
Description

Defense Acquisition Pilot Programs (DAPPs) were established to jump- start the initiatives outlined in the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act (FASA) of 1994. DAPPs were provided legislative authority to implement the provisions of FASA before they were published in regulations, authority to use the commercial item exemptions for non-commercial items and were also given expedited deviation authority from the FAR/DFARS and the DOD 5000 series regulations. The Joint Primary Aircraft Training System (JPATS) was designated a pilot program by the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition Reform. The purpose of this paper is to provide insight into the Joint Primary Aircraft Training System (JPATS) acquisition and describe, if any, the results of acquisition reform on program effectiveness, cost, schedule, and performance. Eleven metrics were established by the JPATS program and then measured against established baseline programs to derive quantitative savings attributed to implementing acquisition reform. An analysis of those metrics concludes acquisition reform is having mixed results on this program. Only two measures seem successful indicators of acquisition reform, while the remaining nine seem to indicate more success is being realized from applying acquisition program management reform efforts highlighted in DOD directives than statutory and regulatory relief provided DAPPs.


Subjects: acquisition reform; major weapon systems; acquisition stremling
Language English
Publication date June 2000
Current location
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink
Accession number
acasestudyacquis109459296
Source
Internet Archive identifier: acasestudyacquis109459296
https://archive.org/download/acasestudyacquis109459296/acasestudyacquis109459296.pdf
Permission
(Reusing this file)
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.

Licensing[edit]

Public domain
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code. Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current20:14, 13 July 2020Thumbnail for version as of 20:14, 13 July 20201,275 × 1,650, 121 pages (4.44 MB) (talk | contribs)FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection acasestudyacquis109459296 (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #5064)

Metadata