File:A case analysis of the dual sourcing strategy as used in the acquisition of the Army's Javelin medium anti-armor weapons program (IA acasenalysisofdu109457445).pdf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Go to page
next page →
next page →
next page →

Original file(1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 23.21 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 109 pages)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary[edit]

A case analysis of the dual sourcing strategy as used in the acquisition of the Army's Javelin medium anti-armor weapons program   (Wikidata search (Cirrus search) Wikidata query (SPARQL)  Create new Wikidata item based on this file)
Author
Buck, Christopher S.
image of artwork listed in title parameter on this page
Title
A case analysis of the dual sourcing strategy as used in the acquisition of the Army's Javelin medium anti-armor weapons program
Publisher
Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
Description

The use of competition during the acquisition of major weapon systems is a key ingredient to mitigating risk and reducing total program costs, One tool the program manager (PM) has at his disposal to ensure competition is viable is dual sourcing. Since the 1960's, PMs have continuously considered the advantages and disadvantages of dual sourcing when developing their acquisition strategy. However, in the past few years dual sourcing as an overall program strategy has come close to being abandoned. Sole source procurement, especially in the production phase of major weapon systems, has returned as the norm. It appears the cause for this can be directly traced to the large force drawdowns, reduced budgets and decreased quantity requirements of the 1990's. The Army's Javelin program, which began in the 1980's, developed its acquisition strategy around the use of dual sourcing. Dual sourcing within this program has focused both on the overall program level (macro) and at the subcomponent level (micro). The lessons learned and techniques used in this program may provide useful insight for other PMs considering the use of dual sourcing, or within programs facing budget cuts or program downsizing.


Subjects:
Language English
Publication date December 1995
publication_date QS:P577,+1995-12-00T00:00:00Z/10
Current location
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink
Accession number
acasenalysisofdu109457445
Source
Internet Archive identifier: acasenalysisofdu109457445
https://archive.org/download/acasenalysisofdu109457445/acasenalysisofdu109457445.pdf
Permission
(Reusing this file)
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. As such, it is in the public domain, and under the provisions of Title 17, United States Code, Section 105, may not be copyrighted.

Licensing[edit]

Public domain
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code. Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current20:13, 13 July 2020Thumbnail for version as of 20:13, 13 July 20201,275 × 1,650, 109 pages (23.21 MB) (talk | contribs)FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection acasenalysisofdu109457445 (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #5061)

Metadata