Commons talk:WMF support for Commons/GLAM Metrics Needs
[edit]
Here's the survey results about tools that GLAMs use on meta. There was also blog post summarizing the findings: "In the category of statistics tools, the popularity of tools varies. The very flexible Pageviews Analysis is by far the most popular; various more specific dashboard tools receive similar appreciation and seem at a similar level with each other in popularity. In the category of batch contribution and upload tools, two tools focused on structured data and Wikidata contribution rank most highly: QuickStatements and OpenRefine. Pattypan follows (with a small distance) as the third preferred tool, receiving relatively more appreciation from Wikimedians (and a bit less from cultural institution workers)." Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 18:25, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @Rachel Helps (BYU)! Thank you for the survey results and blog post summarizing the findings. I think it would be great if you could consider moving the information to the main page. This way, the information can be easily accessed and referenced by all interested parties. Thanks again! Udehb-WMF (talk) 16:06, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- okay, I wasn't sure what level of information would be on the main page vs. the talk page. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 19:39, 24 February 2023 (UTC)