Commons talk:Administrators/Archive/Successful requests for adminship

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

UI : # or *[edit]

I moved from bulet list (wiki *) to numbered list (wiki #) so one can have an easy insight of the entrance / exit of admin along the years. Need to be done on both Unsuccessful and Successful request for comparison. Yug (talk) 14:13, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree, i see no need. No need to count. Please keep it as is. Thanks! --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:16, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Disagreeing is not a rational. It's an authoritative "no I see no need". Please explain since as of now the rational "provide easy quantitative insight of the entrance / exit of admins along the years" do augment the value of the list for the community and is thus stronger than a "no" rational. The page can be improved for the benefit of the community, it's a wiki. Yug (talk) 14:19, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Most current admins are long term zombie admins, thus putting huge pressure and high stress level on active admins. Having clear quantitative insight is the HR is needed. Numbered lists would help to do so. Yug (talk) 15:14, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Commons:List_of_administrators_by_date and Commons:List_of_administrators confirm that others on Commons appreciate numbered lists on the issue as it provide quantitative insight. You also have been pinged to join the talk and been active since. Numbered list is classic on this issue, let's move forward it's a wiki. Yug (talk) 14:15, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]