Commons:Valued image candidates/Rdeča mušnica (Amanita muscaria).jpg

Rdeča mušnica (Amanita muscaria).jpg

promoted

Image
Nominated by	Mile (talk) on 2017-10-14 08:32 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Amanita muscaria var. aureola, immature
Used in	Global usage Amanita muscaria var. aureola, Muhara
Review (criteria)	Comment No question this is great and I'm a bit surprised there isn't a single VI in a category of over 900 images already. My question to myself is does this image represent all Amanita Muscaria var. Aureola. It could absolutely but should it? Do you think this should be the VI for all of Amanita Muscaria var. Aureola or should the scope be changed to add something along the lines of Immature fruiting body? I could see it both ways really. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:17, 14 October 2017 (UTC)  Comment A photographic identification on an immature specimen is extremely difficult. The Label is supposed to be an identification reference, this is not the case here. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:50, 15 October 2017 (UTC) I can only add immature. Other will stay. I can make category there, but wont pushing othe photos into, its problem with mushrooms, even "knowers" get poisoned. --Mile (talk) 10:05, 15 October 2017 (UTC)  Comment I'm not overly concerned with misidentification here. I'm trusting the source since with Mycelium when it starts to fruit, it almost never sends up one fruiting body. So I'm trusting that since I see nothing obviously wrong with the identification of the photo that the specimen is identified correctly. I also wouldn't create a new category. I see no need for that. I'm just wondering if the scope needs to say that this is an immature fruiting body. What did you mean by "The Label is supposed to be an identification reference"? -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 17:54, 15 October 2017 (UTC)  Comment Probably to be in Infobox !? Can be, if they make En.wiki article, otheriwise will be added to Amanita muscaria as representing, just made talk about that there. --Mile (talk) 21:07, 15 October 2017 (UTC)  Comment Adding immature would be a good compromise. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 16 October 2017 (UTC)  Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 17 October 2017 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 19 October 2017 (UTC)