Commons:Valued image candidates/Alum Creek joining Big Walnut Creek 1.jpg

Alum Creek joining Big Walnut Creek 1.jpg

promoted

Image
Nominated by	Sixflashphoto (talk) on 2017-09-30 13:59 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Alum Creek at the confluence of Big Walnut Creek
Used in	Global usage en: Alum Creek (Ohio)
Review (criteria)	Question I have been looking for over and hour for how to fix my image. If anyone could help and tell me what happened I'd really appreciate it. Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:22, 30 September 2017 (UTC)  Comment I tried to help. Maybe you just forgot the "Three Creeks". Enter exactly the name you gave the file. --Milseburg (talk) 19:23, 30 September 2017 (UTC)  Comment Milseburg You did help! Thank you! I'm usually good with VI's but I had never seen that before. Thank you again, Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:53, 30 September 2017 (UTC)  Comment Very good but in scopes there is no use to put links to the articles, you can do it for the caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 1 October 2017 (UTC) Thank you for letting me know that. Learn something every day! Sixflashphoto (talk) 07:58, 1 October 2017 (UTC) Scope changed from Alum Creek at the confluence of Big Walnut Creek to new scope --Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:52, 1 October 2017 (UTC) Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 4 October 2017 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 6 October 2017 (UTC)