Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 21 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Southease_Church,from_the_east.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination The Parish Church. By User:Michael Coppins --Lewis Hulbert 21:56, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --A.Savin 00:08, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree, the picture is fine but the description should be a bit more than just three words and a tag. A reader should not have to go back through the categories to find out where the church is located or even which country it's located in. Please fix that and I'll support this for QI. --W.carter 21:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support. Nice church, good composition, perhaps a bit too bright. But this should be correctable. -- Spurzem 08:04, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • The thing that brought that pic here was not the quality of the photo, but the documentation on the file's page. It is stated very clearly in the rules for QI that description, categories and file name must be good as well, yet so many users seem to forget this and focus only on the photo itself. Without a good description a file is hard to find and hard to use. W.carter 08:16, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support and added a wiki link. As the church is very famous, I think it is enough now. Jkadavoor 04:59, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thanks Jkadavoor for providing some more clarity. I strike my 'O' now, this should send the pic on its way. W.carter 08:41, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 11:02, 20 September 2016 (UTC)