Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 20 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Озеро_Журавлине.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Lake in Eastern Ukaine by User:AlevYansen --Anntinomy 18:50, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Strong opposition Insufficient quality. Poor file description. Overcast clouds, blurry. --Moroder 18:36, 16 September 2017 (UTC).
  •  Support Looks good or me.--Ahonc 21:57, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Mild  Support - I do see problems, including posterization in the sky which would be good to address, but it's a reasonably large file, the composition is nice and the quality seems acceptable, overall. -- Ikan Kekek 08:05, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --XRay 07:11, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Encelia californica in Balboa Park.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination I took this picture of this flower in Balboa Park. --Kong of Lasers 22:53, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment Nice, but you need to identity the species of your plants and animals. PumpkinSky 00:10, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
@PumpkinSky: It is Helianthus niveus. --Kong of Lasers 00:37, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
I'm having trouble deciding on how to vote on this, so I'm sending to CR. PumpkinSky 23:45, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
@PumpkinSky:
What's CR?--Kong of Lasers 02:07, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
 Info "Consensual Review". :)--Peulle 06:14, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  OpposeThe sharpness isn't enough. CA. Sorry. --SKas 11:04, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  OpposeNo proper description and categories, unsharp, aggressive noise reduction. --Nino Verde 15:12, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - Really unfocused at full size. -- Ikan Kekek 08:11, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 Question Why declined after only 2 days? For me it is QI with very good colors and sufficient sharpness. -- Spurzem 10:11, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --XRay 07:10, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Bad_Kissingen_Arkadenbau_0417RM0274-PSD.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Arcade building of the Regentenbau of Bad Kissingen --Ermell 06:40, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  SupportGood night photo. --Peulle 06:42, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Spoiled panorama by f/2.8, check monument in front, sharpless and grainy. --PetarM 07:18, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment Let`s hear some other opinions.--Ermell 17:00, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It is really grainy --Nino Verde 09:40, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
    •  Comment New version uploaded which might be better.--Ermell 10:03, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support - Very good, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 20:16, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Fine --Moroder 09:54, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Spurzem 10:31, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --XRay 07:09, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Bad_Kissingen_altes_Rathaus_0417RM0259.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Old townhall Bad Kissingen --Ermell 06:40, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  SupportGood quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:45, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I oppose, check tower, bad photoshoping, tower distorted too much. --PetarM 08:29, 12 September 2017 (UTC)@PetarM:
  • ✓ Done Tryed to fix it. Please have another look and thanks for the review.--Ermell 07:32, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Ermell i did, around the top its spoiled by using brush, noise celaning isnt spectacular here. I think you need some learning what f ot use, here 2.8, then 7.1,... you can get all without noise, no need to clean. Left picture same problem, f 2.8 isnt for panorama. --PetarM 08:14, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thanks for your hints. I`ve uploaded a new version. I did never use a brush on any versions and think that f 2.8 is the best choice for a handheld shot in this case.Otherwise I agree with you.--Ermell 20:34, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support In my opinion this image reaches quality status. --Milseburg 13:31, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment - There are dark spots on the upper right area of the sky. Otherwise, I would support this photo. -- Ikan Kekek 20:19, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
    •  Question @Ikan Kekek: I cannot find the spots Ikan, could help me and mark them?--Ermell 13:41, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
      • No, I don't think I can, because I can't see them except at full size. But they're all to the right of the metal part of the spire, starting quite close to it and increasing further to the right. -- Ikan Kekek 19:03, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --XRay 15:55, 19 September 2017 (UTC)