Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 15 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Mangosteen1.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Purple mangosteen --مانفی 04:54, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose check the white balance, but I´m unsure also for the rest, because there is no DOF, which is necessary for studio works --Hubertl 06:42, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
     CommentWhite balance can be investigated from fruit core. It looks OK.--مانفی 15:31, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
     Comment The color "White" has very little, almost nothing to do with "white balance". --Hubertl 19:22, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
     Comment I actually don't understand your point. When part of picture which is really white, looks perfect white, it means white balance is OK. Isn't it?مانفی 12:01, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
     Comment No, not at all. Please read the link above about white/color/grey balance. You are using Lightroom, so use the White Balance function. In this case use the pipette manually on the background. If you set the color temperature to -15 and the tint to -23, it will be ok. BTW: Nothing in nature is really white per definition. --Hubertl 12:23, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, not done! --Hubertl 15:55, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Kashk_e_Badamjan.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Kashk e Badamjan --مانفی 06:50, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment Not categorized. --Cccefalon 12:58, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done--مانفی 08:03, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Tsungam 06:41, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 15:54, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Canna_fruits_2015-09-1.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination cannas Fruits (rajbiraj Nepal) --Bijay chaurasia 10:17, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose No categories. --Cccefalon 12:59, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
     Comment categories added. Plz! review again. --Bijay chaurasia 05:42, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
     Comment open request, Cccefalon, just a service ;-) --Hubertl 06:10, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose too soft --Berthold Werner 10:42, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 15:53, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Wuppertal_-_Beyenburger_Stausee_-_Drachenbootrennen_11_ies.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Dragon boat race in Wuppertal-Beyenburg, June 2009. By User:Ies --Atamari 18:17, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:53, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose Not really sharp due to diffraction (f/22) - mostly. I don't think a in focus background was needed for this photo. --C messier 15:16, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not really sharp, too tight at bottom (see the beard)--Lmbuga 12:35, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 07:51, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Sankta Katarina kyrkoruin01.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Saint Catherine cathedral in Visby, Sweden. --Esquilo 10:05, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Are you kidding? The totally blurred pesons are obviously added with photoshop. Also oversaturated and too much distorted. --Cccefalon 04:12, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
     Comment The persons are blurred because it is a HDR photo and they were not stationary. I can remove them if you feel any better about it. The distorsion has been corrected and the saturation of the sky is natural (sun in the east, photo taken to the west at high angle).--Esquilo 07:57, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Please don´t be so offensive, QI is not a platform to make others feel better. Cccefalon is absolutely right! --Hubertl 08:33, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
     Comment Am I the one being offensive!? --Esquilo 11:53, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
     Comment What do you want to insinuate with that exclamation-question? --Cccefalon 12:49, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Colors look fine to me, a bit dark in the shadows. Perspective is ok. --Tsungam 06:49, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Overprocessed, weird halos. -- Smial 11:08, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --C messier 15:25, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Vista_de_Tarazona,_España,_2015-01-02,_DD_24-26_HDR.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination View of Tarazona, Spain --Poco a poco 16:33, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose To much HDR; unreal, IMO --C T Johansson 16:45, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree. It´s a after sunset situation and artificial lights. --Hubertl 16:54, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
     Comment Thanks for the discussion Hubertl, I don't see anything wrong for using the special lighting moments the day has to offer. I haven't edited this file other than others Poco a poco 17:33, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support As Hubertl. --Esquilo 08:10, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Overprocessed. -- Smial 11:24, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support good imho --Berthold Werner 10:43, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support OK --PetarM 18:31, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support As Hubertl, and I like the mood. --Dr. Chriss 04:03, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support For me very good. --Hockei 18:18, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 15:50, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Malta - Mgarr + Fort Bingemma 02 ies.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination: Agricultural lowlands in Mġarr and Fort Bingemma on top of the hill in Rabat, Malta -- Ies 10:49, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment also here, magenta ca, repairable! --Hubertl 06:37, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:30, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose until it is repaired --Hubertl 18:39, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Hubertl 06:41, 14 September 2015 (UTC)