Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 14 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Exemple_grotesque_2-3_Hôtel_de_Ville_d'Aix-en-Provence_(voir_photo_Salle_du_conseil).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Hôtel de ville.Exemple d'un grotesque sculpté sur les rangements ceignant la salle du conseil de la mairie d'Aix-en-Provence. By User:Ddeveze --Marianne Casamance 15:13, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Image is noisy, not sharp and composition is not perfect --Shansov.net 19:10, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
 Comment Here is not FP. Therefore a composition must not be perfect but the image should be cropped at the left. Otherwise the image is sharp enough for me und not too noisy as I think. Please correct the crop and than we should discuss. -- Spurzem 19:40, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
 Comment What I mean by "composition" is that the main object is cropped, and perspective affecting it too. Of course I'm not talking about artistic composition here. --Shansov.net 16:33, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I'm with Shansov; I don't even need to look at the full size to see that the top and bottom crop are too tight.--Peulle 06:17, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others. Part of the judgment at QIC is down to how well the subject is represented. These crops are just too distracting, IMO. If the cropping is improved, yes, it would be a QI. So User:Ddeveze, would you like to try for more symmetrical crops? Ikan Kekek 00:18, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Above vote stricken as it lacks signature.--Peulle 10:15, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Signed and unstricken. -- Ikan Kekek 00:18, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 20:33, 14 September 2017 (UTC)