Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 12 2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Shlyuzovoy-125_with_7663_barge_on_the_Khimki_Reservoir_2021-06-18_8696.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Shlyuzovoy-125 with 7663 barge on the Khimki Reservoir --Mike1979 Russia 13:53, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Oppose Sorry! Cropped cranes and not really sharp. --Steindy 23:00, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
  •  SupportGood enough for promotion IMO. Let’s put it in CR--Jebulon 00:34, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Okay now. So it was an unnecessary crop. --Steindy 09:06, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg 14:15, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

File:House_of_workers_on_Proletarskaya_Street_148.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination The architectural ensemble "Houses of workers". Tambov, Russia. --Alexander Novikov 13:41, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:53, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This isn't a QI to me, the top crop is far too tight --Poco a poco 14:23, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
  • I don't thinks so, in this specific occasion this is no quality criteria. To me the picture is nicely balanced.--Horst J. Meuter 16:48, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support OK. --A.Savin 14:04, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
  •  Neutral Excellent sharpness and light, but the composition is not optimum in my opinion, sorry. The crop of the top is disappointing, but the pole at right could have been eliminated.--Jebulon 00:20, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
    ✓ Done Pole at right removed. Alexander Novikov 09:55, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
    Thank you. Vote changed for neutral.--Jebulon 16:12, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support QI for me --Moroder 15:37, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support The crop of the top is just about an antenna or a simple mast, not problematic to me. QI. --Sebring12Hrs 16:31, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek 19:50, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg 14:17, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Macaque de Gibraltar (Macaca sylvanus) (Kintzheim, France).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Barbary Ape ( Macaca sylvanus ) at Monkey Mountain in Kintzheim (Bas-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 07:11, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose unfortunately the hand is cropped --Charlesjsharp 08:55, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:01, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose There was plenty of room (see top crop), so the whole hand should have been in the shot.--Peulle 11:33, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 11:55, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Guys, is this FPC now? The photo is technically almost flawless and just has one tiny design flaw. The image resolution is even good enough to crop the photo to a tightly cropped portrait, and then it would still be a QI in my opinion. --Smial 13:21, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry but per Charlesjsharp. Nice to be back here after years, I see that nothing has changed here ! Funny. Or not ? --Jebulon 00:15, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unfortunate crop (welcome back Jebulon!) --Moroder 15:39, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment Welcome back, Jebulon! No vote from me on this photo, though, at least for now. -- Ikan Kekek 19:52, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment I understand. Unfortunate crop because taken quickly to freeze the facial expression. Gzen92 09:31, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Milseburg 14:18, 11 September 2021 (UTC)