Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 10 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Craigellachie_(BC,_Canada),_The_Last_Spike,_Waggon_--_2022_--_105530.jpg[edit]

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined XRay 07:44, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portland,_Oregon_(May_28,_2018)_-_125.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Wilhelm's Portland Memorial Funeral Home, Portland, Oregon --Another Believer 13:09, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 14:52, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose poorly processed, lost sharpness due to strong jpeg compression, unfortunately --George Chernilevsky 19:22, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Low resolution, noise, digital processing artifacts --LexKurochkin 07:28, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek 06:38, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Strong noise, overprocessed by denoising and sharpening. --Smial 13:07, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:31, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Marmota_marmota_Tauerntal_20220816_03.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination: Alpine marmot (Marmota marmota) in High Tauern National Park, Carinthia, Austria --Uoaei1 04:33, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:47, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose not really ion focus, might be able to be sharpened? Shadows should be lifted --Charlesjsharp 16:08, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 10:33, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

File:20190206_P-8_Poseidon_Kadena_AB-12.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination A US Navy P-8 Poseidon on final approach to Kadena Air Base in Okinawa, Japan. --Balon Greyjoy 08:28, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:35, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Underexposed - may be fixable. --GRDN711 15:34, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support The image is properly exposed except very small areas near retractable landing gear. It is unavoidable considering the aircraft speed. -- LexKurochkin 12:41, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support --Palauenc05 15:50, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Might be a little dark, but certainly sharp. -- Ikan Kekek 03:50, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too dark. Otherwise good. --Milseburg 10:49, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Milseburg. Some s-curving may help. --Smial 12:47, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Not too dark at all, please open the file on a wide screen. --Sebring12Hrs 13:49, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Milseburg, but, it is fixable. I can say without equivocation that it will appear far better adjusting (single RGB) color levels. --Terragio67 03:24, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:34, 9 September 2022 (UTC)