Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 10 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Les_détails_de_l'architecture.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination détails of architecture --Cheima fezzani 00:01, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:35, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree, it needs better file name, description and categories. --W.carter 19:24, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - I agree with W.carter. It's a good, interesting photo, and I would support the nomination after the problems identified above are corrected, so consider this a provisional support vote once that happens, in case I don't have a chance to read this again. -- Ikan Kekek 03:48, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 07:39, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Until we learn more about this building. Also, I'm not sure if DOF is OK. --C messier 12:53, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per others and categorization: Only Category:Architecture. Whithout data.--Lmbuga 19:24, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 16:52, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Hammam interior - caldarium.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Hammam's interior - caldarium --Aymen FANTAR 23:21, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 03:18, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I do not agree. The file hasn't a meaningful filename. --XRay 05:20, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment Filename is acceptable now, but the image needs perspective correction. --XRay 18:53, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support IMO OK now. Thank you. --XRay 16:03, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment Is it better now? --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 14:27, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
  • All we now this is a hammam in Tunisia. We need more exact information, what is the name of the hammam, in which town it is and a geotage is pretty usefull. I guess there isn't only one hamman in Tunisia. Termporally  Oppose. --C messier 12:07, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
  • @Aymen FANTAR: 'Pinging' the nominator/uploader on this, s(he) should really help us out here with this. W.carter 15:19, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Is it better now? Aymen FANTAR 13:18, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
  • The description and categories are much better. Thank you. Now we can move on to the photographic part. This photo would be better if you did a small perspective adjustment. Right now the rows of tiles are leaning in a little towards the middle, these lines should be perfectly vertical in such a photo. I hope you have a photo editing program of some sort to do this otherwise there are free such that you can download from the internet. W.carter 14:22, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
  • I agree, it needs a perspective correction, Poco a poco 18:28, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Perscpective corrected --Aymen FANTAR 22:50, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
  • The left side looks ok now but the right side of the tiling is still tilting. Not sure if you really did a full perspective correction or just rotated the picture slightly. Please try again. W.carter 08:17, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
  • I did a full perspective correction on LR, but the building in the right side is not straight it's an old one --Aymen FANTAR 08:49, 6 September 2016 (UTC).
  • I'm not talking about the walls, I can understand that they are old and wonky, but the right side of the tiling. See my note on the file's page, it appears as a frame in the picture when you move your mouse over it. Also please remember to always sign your posts with the "four squigglies" otherwise you comment may be ignored since no one can see who did it. W.carter 08:46, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
  • I see i'll try to fix it, thank you for helping me :) --Aymen FANTAR 10:01, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Please check it i fixed it... --Aymen FANTAR 11:36, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Poco a poco 11:53, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support --W.carter 12:38, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 16:50, 9 September 2016 (UTC)