Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 04 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Chicago,_Illinois,_U.S._(2023)_-_332.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Lincoln Park, Chicago, Illinois --Another Believer 20:54, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose  Level of detail too low --Jakubhal 15:18, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support. I don't understand the criticism. Good quality. Please discuss -- Spurzem 20:33, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Not pixel sharp, but enough of the details are there, and it's fine that further back sculptures are less sharp. My only concern is whether these artworks are currently under copyright, because if they are, this photo needs to be deleted from Commons. -- Ikan Kekek 18:11, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:34, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

File:Sverdlova_Street_PTZ_(img2).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Sverdlova Street in Petrozavodsk --Florstein 09:16, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Low level of detail. Also, there is a minor perspective distortion (the building on the right is leaning to the right)) --Jakubhal 15:22, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
  • New version with fixed perspective uploaded. But... low level of detail? Seriously? --Florstein 17:14, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks fine to me. -- Ikan Kekek 05:31, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I see it. It kind of looks like a mobile phone shot.--Peulle 09:54, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support per Ikan. Can't find significant issues. --Smial 10:36, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose There are CA on the branches in the center of the frame. --Mike1979 Russia 17:22, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
 Comment CA? Really? Zooming in to 400% I can find some tiny artifacts, probably due to demosaicing, but CA? --Smial 22:12, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
 Comment Maybe they are not CA but there are a lot of point color artifacts and right in the center of the frame. --Mike1979 Russia 05:20, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
 Comment But you did realise that the photo has well over 30 Mpixels and that these small artefacts are practically invisible at a normal viewing distance and only noticeable in strong magnification? If we extend the vehemence with which photos from mobile phones are meticulously searched for faults to ALL the photos presented here, we can put an end to QI, because there will be no more "pros". --Smial 06:35, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
@Smial: thank you for your support! I appreciate it. --Florstein 08:54, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
@Mike1979 Russia: Et tu, Brute? Sadly. --Florstein 08:54, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
@Florstein: Sorry, bro. But you have a lot of good photos without any defects other than this one. --Mike1979 Russia 15:29, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:35, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

File:Pine_View_Nursery_-_Cactus_-_13.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Cactus at the Pine View Nursery, Kalimpong --Sumitsurai 06:40, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 07:27, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Without categorization, the images are pretty worthless. --Ermell 08:02, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
     Comment Thanks for pointing it out Ermell. My bad. Have added the category. --Sumitsurai 10:47, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
 Support Sorry, a bit late.--Ermell 21:44, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --多多123 16:58, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Would have liked to see better framing of the cactus so that if fills the frame. --GRDN711 15:37, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment OK, but what is the light vertical line that seems to be between the cactus and the cement fence? I can mark it if you like. -- Ikan Kekek 07:23, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
    • Sorry, which line are you referring to? --Sumitsurai 02:58, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment I hope it's OK that I added a note to your photo. -- Ikan Kekek 05:14, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment Wow! What an eye for detail Ikan! Honestly, I am not sure. But think Smial is right. Might be a spider web thread. --Sumitsurai 20:26, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
 Comment Probably a thread from a spider web. --Smial 08:56, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support That makes sense. Thanks, guys. -- Ikan Kekek 18:15, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:37, 3 September 2023 (UTC)