Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 31 2019

• 
  • Nomination Garden wall in Henryków --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:20, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Western outbuilding in Henryków 1 --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:18, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Western outbuilding in Henryków 2 --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:18, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mercedes-Benz B-Class in Stuttgart, Germany. --Alexander-93 19:38, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality. Quite blurry and too much image noise. --Vauxford 03:43, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Greifenburg in Kärnten, the Drautalstrasse from hotel Rossman with church (katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt. Katharina) --Michielverbeek 17:55, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 18:25, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Waisach in Kärnten, church: katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Nikolaus --Michielverbeek 17:55, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 18:25, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Weinrebenblatt im Gegenlicht, Rheinland-Pfalz, Deutsche Weinstrasse.--Fischer.H 17:46, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:47, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Buildings on the island Tynningö in Stockholm archipelago. --ArildV 17:38, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:47, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nationalmuseum, Stockholm. --ArildV 17:38, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:47, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Red dears on the island Dzharylhach By User:Larisa Uhryn --Anntinomy 16:13, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --GRDN711 17:33, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Panoramic view of the hills above Dniester river in Ukraine by User:Zysko serhii --Anntinomy 16:13, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:40, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dawn at the Sula River in Ukraine by User:Pavlo Prystai --Anntinomy 16:13, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:38, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bay of Câmara de Lobos, Madeira, Portugal --Poco a poco 12:55, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --EV Raudtee 13:05, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Câmara Municipal de Sintra, Sintra, Portugal --Poco a poco 12:55, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Milseburg 12:59, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Castelo dos Mouros, Sintra, Portugal --Poco a poco 12:55, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --EV Raudtee 13:05, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fonte Mourisca, Parque da Liberdade, Sintra, Portugal --Poco a poco 12:55, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --EV Raudtee 13:05, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Lucy taking the Eucharist in the Chiesa di San Gaetano church in Brescia. --Moroder 11:58, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good quality. --EV Raudtee 12:23, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination SELLER OF CONDIMENTS ON THE BRIDGE MARCHE DANTOKPA-COTONOU BENIN --Adoscam 11:51, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment it needs perspective correction. --EV Raudtee 12:24, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
     Oppose Further the picture tilts right and is too bright. So it is no QI. -- Spurzem 14:53, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pieces of granites superimposed on a crushing site in Parakou-Benin --Adoscam 10:07, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --EV Raudtee 12:25, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination photo of a species of centipede taken at UAC botanical garden in Benin (phot walk) --Adoscam 09:53, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Insufficient quality. Not in focus. No categories. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 10:10, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Woodcarved polichromed statue of the Virgin Mary in the Sant'Angela Merici church in Brescia, --Moroder 09:19, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support but sharpness could be better. --EV Raudtee 12:29, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The road to Yasnogorodka. Ukraine --Ввласенко 09:13, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --EV Raudtee 12:29, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Clarence crescent. Widsor, UK --Ввласенко 09:13, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --EV Raudtee 12:29, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Greece, Rafina, coast --Berthold Werner 08:57, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Can you sharpen the photo? --Steindy 10:13, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
     Oppose Insufficient sharpness. --EV Raudtee 12:21, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rastede Palace --Carschten 08:32, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 09:22, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rastede Palace --Carschten 08:32, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --EV Raudtee 12:31, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lion sculpture (1729) on top of the cemetery gate in Rastede --Carschten 08:32, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 09:20, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination World War II memorial in Rastede --Carschten 08:32, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:05, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination San Francesco da Paola church in Brescia- --Moroder 07:56, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:49, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination San Francesco da Paola church in Brescia. --Moroder 07:56, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:02, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Close-up of a zinnia flower (Zinnia elegans) Stacked with Helicon Focus from 15 pictures --Ermell 07:19, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:24, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cruise ship Viking Vali on the MD channel in Bamberg. Direction Danube. --Ermell 07:19, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:24, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cruise ship Viking Vali on the MD channel in Bamberg. Direction Danube. --Ermell 07:19, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:24, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cruise ship Modigliani on the MD channel in Bamberg. Direction Rhine. --Ermell 07:19, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:24, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cruise ship Modigliani on the MD channel in Bamberg. Direction Rhine. --Ermell 07:19, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:24, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eupatorium (bonesets) at Tirolerkogel, Annaberg, Austria. --GT1976 06:52, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:50, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Third ring wall, Château de Quéribus --Llez 06:33, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:48, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Portal of the third ring wall, Château de Quéribus --Llez 06:33, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:50, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Housing of the governor, Château de Quéribus, France --Llez 06:33, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:51, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain path to the tongue of the Morteratsch glacier View of the impressive Morteratsch glacier.
    --Famberhorst 06:26, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:35, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain path to the tongue of the Morteratsch glacier Split stone by mechanical weathering.
    --Famberhorst 06:26, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:35, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rainy Russula atropurpurea in decline.
    --Famberhorst 06:26, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:38, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour from S-charl a place in the Swiss canton Graubünden to Alp Sesvenna. Erosion field above the mountain path.
    --Famberhorst 06:26, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:38, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Domestic cat sleeps in an armchair -- George Chernilevsky 06:16, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:19, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Castle of Combret in commune of Nauviale, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 06:08, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:20, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Information board about Te Whanganui-A-Hei Marine Reserve on Coromandel Peninsula, North Island of New Zealand. --Tournasol7 06:08, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 07:55, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination St Lawrence church of Sat-Laurent-les-Tours, Lot, France. --Tournasol7 06:08, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:15, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stained-glass windows of the St Gerald abbey church of Aurillac, Cantal, France. --Tournasol7 06:08, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:16, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bell tower of the church in Saint-Julien-de-Piganiol, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 06:08, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:15, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from the top of Mangart towards south-west. --Kallerna 05:43, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose nice composition, but the sky is partially overexposed. --EV Raudtee 12:33, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Atlantic Airways AgustaWestland AW139 OY-HIH at Froðba helicopter station with its pilot. --Kallerna 05:43, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:09, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hiking up the hills of Mangart, Julian Alps. The ridge in the background is the border between Italy and Slovenia. --Kallerna 05:43, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:09, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hikers approaching the top of the Mangart (2679 m). View towards south-west. --Kallerna 05:43, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose nice composition, but the sky is partially overexposed. --EV Raudtee 12:33, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour from Lavin through Val Lavinuoz to Alp d'Immez (2025m.) View from Alp d'Immez on the closing mountains in the back of the valley.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:37, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:59, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain tour from S-charl a place in the Swiss canton Graubünden to Alp Sesvenna. Tree stump.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:37, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:59, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sent (German: Sins ) a place in the Swiss canton Graubünden View of the tower of the Reformierte Kirche Sent.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:37, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 05:58, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bargerveen Meerstalblok. Peat lake with dead birches ( Betula ).
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:37, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:17, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Objekt auf dem Rochusberg in Mannersdorf an der March (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 05:25, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:57, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Objekt auf dem Rochusberg in Mannersdorf an der March (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 05:25, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:57, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Objekt auf dem Rochusberg in Mannersdorf an der March (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 05:25, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Objekt auf dem Rochusberg in Mannersdorf an der March (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 05:25, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:57, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Objekt auf dem Rochusberg in Mannersdorf an der March (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 05:25, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:57, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kurba'il Statue of Shalmaneser III from Fort Shalmaneser (in Nimrud, Mesopotamia, Iraq), in the Iraq Museum, c. 858-824 BCE. By User:Neuroforever --Andrew J.Kurbiko 05:06, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Too shallow DoF IMHO --Poco a poco 18:53, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Castle hotel on Seecorso #10, Velden, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:50, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Northern wing of castle hotel on Seecorso #10, Velden, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:50, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:28, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Window shutters at the castle hotel on Seecorso #10, Velden, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:50, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Western wing of castle hotel on Seecorso #10, Velden, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:50, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mullion at the bay of the western wing of castle hotel on Seecorso #10, Velden, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:50, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:30, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Youba Diarra, player of SC Wiener Neustadt. --Steindy 00:00, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 05:58, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Schinkenrollen gefüllt mit Gemüsemayonnaise, bunter Garnitur und einer Handsemmel in der Konditorei Oberlaa am Wiener Zentralfriedhof By User:Haeferl --Ralf Roletschek 18:03, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support - Short DoF but good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 05:47, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Two owls on a branch by User:Byrdyak --Anntinomy 11:34, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Stoxastikos 12:21, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
     Comment Really cute, fine composition. -- Ikan Kekek 05:51, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Andrew Avellino fainting by Giambattista Pittoni in the Chiesa di San Gaetano church in Brescia. --Moroder 09:48, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. Is the painting damaged, or is blue light hitting it? -- Ikan Kekek 05:53, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
     Comment It's almost certainly a daylight falling from the dome window and reflecting from the oil varnish of the painting. Nothing can be done here except, of course, using some sort of artificial light, which is certainly a no option in any church or museum. They won't even let you set a tripod there in most cases. One can use some tricks in post to make the reflections less prominent, even "disappear" them, so to speak, but the picture won't be genuine after that, not a document anymore but a representation of sorts. --Stoxastikos 15:49, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Objekt auf dem Rochusberg in Mannersdorf an der March (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 06:01, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Paterns on the sky. --Tournasol7 06:09, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
     Done
    New version uploaded. --Manfred Kuzel 14:56, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
    I think that perspective correction is also neded. --Tournasol7 22:51, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
     Done
    Perspective corr. --Manfred Kuzel 06:54, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:12, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A detailed view of a waterfall in Austria, left side. --PantheraLeo1359531 19:24, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn
    The photo seems a bit overexposed to me. --Steindy 10:01, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
     I withdraw my nomination I think you're right, thanks for the review --PantheraLeo1359531 15:31, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Customized portrait of one cinema in Hof for the Hof International Film Festival. --PantheraLeo1359531 16:28, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    The crop looks too randomed to me, can you remove those heads at the bottm? --Poco a poco 19:06, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
     Done Thanks for the review, image cropped. --PantheraLeo1359531 16:53, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:57, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rainy Russula atropurpurea in decline.
    --Famberhorst 05:56, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 07:17, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Protestas en Chile de 2019, Plaza Baquedano, Santiago, Chile --Carlos yo 20:33, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --EV Raudtee 13:33, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Protestas en Chile de 2019, Plaza Baquedano, Santiago, Chile --Carlos yo 20:33, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --EV Raudtee 13:33, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Steering wheels at Tuning World Bodensee 2018 --MB-one 16:53, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 08:46, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Turul statue, Buda Castle, Budapest --Jakubhal 16:41, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --EV Raudtee 13:33, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Evening in Mallnitz. --PantheraLeo1359531 16:07, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline perspective distortion. --EV Raudtee 13:33, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination war memorials in Aplahoué (Benin) --Adoscam 14:26, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --EV Raudtee 13:33, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination War memorials in Djakotomey (Benin) --Adoscam 14:16, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient sharpness. --EV Raudtee 13:33, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Alpine ibex (Capra ibex) in the hills of Cima di Terrarossa, Julian Alps, Italy. --Kallerna 08:51, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. Not bad! --Moroder 08:45, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Immaculate Conception and Saint Susanna church in Stolec 2 --Jacek Halicki 06:44, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:28, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Immaculate Conception and Saint Susanna church in Stolec 3 --Jacek Halicki 06:44, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:28, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Protestas en Chile de 2019, Parque Forestal, Santiago, Chile --Carlos yo 22:55, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. Maybe vandalism is a better description? --Moroder 08:43, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Cholula, Puebla, Mexico --Poco a poco 14:36, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 08:41, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Canon on display which also serves as the city view point in Jaisalmer fort, Rajasthan. By User:Malakarmithun --Sumitsurai 12:59, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment - Good quality photo, but COM:OVERCAT, and a file description can't begin with "Another canon". -- Ikan Kekek 04:21, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
     Oppose - Now there are probably too few categories (nothing for the cannon), and I now see that the filename is misspelled. The description is the same. And by the way, the word is "cannon"; canons are officials in the church. -- Ikan Kekek 06:03, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Magnesite mine in Potworów 2 --Jacek Halicki 07:18, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 08:40, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Former heating plant of the hospital Ochsenzoll in Hamburg --Dirtsc 10:41, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Not a bad photo but I have problem with the post-processing. Not very good HDR imo. --ArildV 09:04, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
     Comment Please feel free to decline, if it doesn't meet your standards. All images of this object have been made in quite difficult lighting circumstances, but I liked the mood and I tried to enforce it in the post-processing. If it's not good enough for QI, I gained at least that experience. Greetings --Dirtsc 16:58, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
     Oppose partially overexposed sky, lens flare. --EV Raudtee 12:38, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:2018-08-07_World_Rowing_Junior_Championships_(Opening_Ceremony)_by_Sandro_Halank–144.jpg

• Nomination Uzbekistan at 2018 World Rowing Junior Championships. By User:Sandro Halank --Andrew J.Kurbiko 05:06, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Sorry but this composition doesn't work. The sign is cut off, and it's an important part of the subject. Either zoom closer or further back. --Peulle 11:34, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment Previous nomination had a good composition, but shifted focus. I guess it's a fail. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 11:39, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Question @Andrew J.Kurbiko: You say it's a fail, yet send the image to CR anyway - was this the intention?--Peulle 08:13, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

• Apparently not. Declined.--Peulle 14:08, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 14:08, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Vlexx_LINT_54,_Rüsselsheim_(_1070811).jpg

• Nomination Alstom Coradia LINT 54 of Vlexx in Rüsselsheim --MB-one 16:53, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
  Verticals need a slight fixing --Ermell 18:34, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
   Support Good quality. --Chenspec 10:26, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
   Oppose I disagree. Not fixed. Please respect my critics. --Ermell 07:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ermell. And downscaled to less than 5 MPixels in an easy-to-take situation. --Smial 13:03, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 00:53, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

File:2019_Kościół_Wniebowzięcia_NMP_i_św._Jana_w_Henrykowie_2.jpg

• Nomination Church of St. Mary in Henryków 2 --Jacek Halicki 07:15, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
  *  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:35, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
  * Has software been used to play with the perspective? The angles feel totally unnatural to my eye. --Bobulous 17:15, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose for now, as I also see several light dust spots. -- Ikan Kekek 06:44, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek:  Done--Jacek Halicki 14:33, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment The towers are very distorted and the shadows are too harsh for me. I would have not nominated this image for QI. But perhaps this is not enough to vote with contra. -- Spurzem 09:36, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - Acceptable to me. Thanks for fixing the dust spots. -- Ikan Kekek 06:04, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 00:53, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Зимова_казка_(Угочанський_замок).jpg

• Nomination Vynohradiv Castle, Carpathian_Ruthenia, near Vynohradiv, Ukraine. By User:K Nick517 --Antanana 08:07, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
   Oppose Sorry, but its just a salad of pixels. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 08:36, 26 October 2019 (UTC)\
•  Comment Have been looking at this image for the last couple of days and cannot make up my mind about it. As castle ruins go, it is a good illustration. That's not quite the same as rating it as an image. Would like to hear from others. --GRDN711 17:56, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Very noisy, grey snow. --Steindy 08:32, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Looks overprocessed.--Peulle 11:47, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose overprocessed. --Smial 13:11, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 00:52, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Gatineau_panorama_from_the_Parliament_Hill.jpg

• Nomination Gatineau panorama from the Parliament Hill, Ottawa. --The Cosmonaut 23:14, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
  Quite nice but could maybe sharpen a bit the right side and straighten the buildings' verticals? They seem to be tilted --Podzemnik 05:35, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
   Done-sharpened and straigtened. --The Cosmonaut 19:27, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
   Oppose Sorry, too noisy for me --Podzemnik 04:39, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
  I think noise level is acceptable for QI. --The Cosmonaut 01:45, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Additionally not sharp enough, especially right side. --EV Raudtee 11:59, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 00:51, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

File:FotD_059_Aufgeschnittener_Mengerschwamm_20191021.png

• Nomination A cut Menger sponge. --PantheraLeo1359531 17:07, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
• Promotion
   Oppose Insufficient quality. --Streetdeck 13:39, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
   Support I don't have a knowledge to evaluate the pic but nearly 59 megapixels don't sound like it's the quality what's lacking --Podzemnik 04:39, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - Looks like excellent quality to me. I don't understand the opposition. Did you mean to oppose a different photo? -- Ikan Kekek 05:41, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Fractal engines produce images that are resolution independent. Unlike cameras that have resolution, bit depth and file size limits by design, a computer with a good graphics processor can make fractals to any size you want. The image resolution will be the same; the only difference is the size of the file or the intended dimensions of the print to be made from the file (how big is enough?). It would be helpful if Commons would provide more guidance on uploading fractals. I believe this photographer is sincere in uploading what he believes to be the best format and size for his fractals image uploads. I disagree with his solution and believe this image is badly over-sampled. At 8000 x 7800 pixels x a 32-bit depth and saved in PNG format without compression becomes a 63.86 MB file size. Beyond a much smaller file size, you would see no difference in quality if the image was 3000 pixels long side and, given the limited range of colors in this image, 8-bit depth would probably be sufficient. --GRDN711 20:44, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Info Of course the fractal resolution (and file size) is a point. When creating that image, I thought about quality and resolution and combined 8K resolution with high quality raymarching, so that shadowed areas are quite good visible and 8K for UHD-2 monitors and TVs. Higher resolution are only useful when zooming in, which is here not really needed. There is already some compression, the original file had about 215 MiB :). --PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 13:41, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support I do not know if there are better oversampling/antialiasing solutions to make the small details look less like noise, but good enough for me.--Tobias ToMar Maier 09:00, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 00:51, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Quebrada_de_las_Conchas_07.jpg

• Nomination Quebrada de las Conchas, Argentina --Bgag 02:47, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:50, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, I disagree. Unsharp, unnatural colours. Please discuss --Llez 04:55, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• Weak  Support. Sharpness only acceptable, and the colours probably slightly oversaturated, but I don't know the real lighting situation, and it's good enough to be printed to A4 and larger. --Smial 07:57, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Looks overprocessed to me. And the colours don't seem entirely natural.--Peulle 08:26, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
• Would look acceptable to me, but it feels like it needs to be rotated two or three degrees clockwise.--Bobulous (talk) 10:56, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment I have uploaded a new version. --Bgag 13:29, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:20, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Beautiful and good -- Spurzem 14:53, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Llez, Tournasol7 22:36, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Liez --Ermell 19:23, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Oversaturated, tilted. Kallerna 19:27, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Who was there to know the natural colours? Great view --Moroder 22:05, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too soft. --Milseburg 12:52, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Insufficient sharpness. --EV Raudtee 13:57, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 7 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 00:49, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Говерла,_Петрос_і_Свидовецький_масив_в_одному_кадрі.jpg

• Nomination Carpathian Biosphere Reserve by Misha Reme --Andrew J.Kurbiko 15:23, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:48, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

  Agree that it does indeed need a perspective correction,  Oppose until that is fixed Poco a poco 07:53, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose I disagree. Not a QI for me. CAs at the horizon + distorted and unsharp towards the left and right side. The trees are strongly leaning out there.. --Milseburg 17:22, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Beautiful picture, and I see absolutely no sign of chromatic aberration anywhere in the image. (Milseburg, are you talking about the orange flaring along the mountain edge caused by the sunset? I don't find that unpleasant at all.) The periphery is softer but looks fine at full screen size, and the focal point (the snow trail and the habitation) are sharp. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobulous (talk • contribs) 2019-10-20 11:05 (UTC)

I'm wondering, that the extreme distortion doesn't matter you. --Milseburg (talk) 17:39, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality.--Steindy 14:21, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Question - Before I vote, I want to hear from the people supporting this photo: If you ever support perspective correction in any situation, why is it OK with you that all the trees are leaning drastically right on the right side and drastically left on the left side? Poco a poco, Bobulous, Steindy? -- Ikan Kekek 04:46, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Milseburg.--Peulle 06:28, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Milseburg.--Ermell 19:26, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose --Kallerna 19:29, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Photography itself is a distortion, so what? I love it --Moroder 22:02, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

 Question Moroder, do you ever support perspective correction? If so, why not in this case? I want to understand how people are thinking about this. Same question for Poco a poco, Bobulous, Steindy and anyone else who wants to weigh in. Ikan Kekek 04:31, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

 Comment @Ikan Kekek: I understand that perspective control is requested for architectural images, including lampposts. Unfortunately results are not always good. For landscapes I'd accept free composition--Moroder 06:01, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, Moroder. Anyone else want to express a view on this? I'd like to learn something. -- Ikan Kekek 08:14, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

 Comment @Ikan Kekek: I can understand you and you are in principle right with your opinion. But I believe that such strict standards apply to architectural photography, but not to landscape photographs. There are also photos that live on the mood and the design. I set this higher and I just like this photo, so I see no reason to correct my vote. --Steindy 14:56, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

shifted version

 Comment - I don't have a firm opinion; I'm just trying my best to understand. My brother has done some professional photography and thinks the kind of perspective correction people do here is absurd and unprofessional and doesn't represent the way we actually see, so I've gotten more than one view of this and haven't really decided anything beyond what strikes me as good or bad as a viewer. -- Ikan Kekek 05:50, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

 Comment @Ikan Kekek: I despise perspective "correction" in post (using software) and I also think that there is far too strong a fashion here for verticals to be perfectly parallel. I even feel that way when we're talking about architectural photos. Here in a discussion about a nature landscape it just sounds absurd to me that people are demanding that trees on the fringe of the image be stretched into verticals. This image is beautiful, shows the landscape clearly and crisply, and has excellent lighting. To reject it because of slightly leaning trees and a very fine edge of sun bleed on the mountain edge would seem very wrong to me. --Bobulous 14:48, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

@Bobulous: And what is your vote? --Steindy 19:49, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

@Steindy: My vote is already cast (though I forgot to add the signature, so it's less easy to spot my supporting comment above).--Bobulous 12:49, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment - I would really like to see what this photo would look like with perspective correction. I appreciate the answers to my question and I'll think about them but do find this view a little strange and won't vote on the photo. -- Ikan Kekek 06:42, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment @Ikan Kekek: I have uploded you the shifted version. The image is narrower and the beautiful impression of the distance is lost. In addition, the beautiful diagonals that characterize the photo, not so impressive. I do not like it as much as the original. --Steindy (talk) 17:28, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment - I agree with you. Thank you for uploading that. -- Ikan Kekek 06:07, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Support - Based on this comparison, I feel impelled to support. -- Ikan Kekek 06:08, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment I don´t understand the discussion. Obviously, the wrong recording technique was chosen from the outset for this motif. The question of whether subsequent corrections make sense does not arise at all. --Milseburg 12:18, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 00:48, 31 October 2019 (UTC)