Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 25 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Zicht vanaf het water op de Alde Feanen van het It Fryske Gea. Waardevol natuurgebied in Friesland 38.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination View from the water on the Alde Feanen of It Fryske Gea. Valuable nature in profince Friesland in the Netherlands.
    Famberhorst 15:56, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Perfect. Wonderful. Overwhelming. Good quality. --Code 18:38, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment @Famberhorst: Not an oppose, just ask for perspective corrections as the building is leaning. --Christian Ferrer 19:01, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done. Thank you.--Famberhorst 16:12, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
 Support --Christian Ferrer 17:06, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Not a FP as already said somewhere, but a good QI for sure.--Jebulon 17:11, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Σπάρτακος 20:36, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Hubertl 06:21, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 08:11, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Πλατεία 18 Άγγλων, Ηράκλειο 9286.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Plateia 18 Agglon, Heraklion. --C messier 06:50, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Poor composition, subject is not clear --MB-one 18:18, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment It is the small square in the foreground. --C messier 16:43, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 21:40, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Hubertl 10:18, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 08:10, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Dome_of_San_Giovanni_dei_Fiorentini_(Rome)_HDR.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Dome of San Giovanni dei Fiorentini (Rome) HDR. By User:Livioandronico2013 --Σπάρτακος 08:06, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:30, 16 October 2015 (UTC){
  •  Oppose Not centered, random composition, tight crop above.--Jebulon 11:37, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment I'm sorry but I disagree. I can understand the "tight crop" but I can't the term "random" and "not centered", FP is not here, I think the judgment is too harsh --Σπάρτακος 20:07, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough but slight assymetry along the upper margin could be fixed. Alvesgaspar 09:53, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support in this case, because it is not symetrical itself, my support. --Hubertl 06:24, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 08:09, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Nottuln,_Appelhülsen,_Kriegergedächtniskapelle_--_2015_--_5459.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination War memorial chapel, Appelhülsen, Nottuln, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 02:15, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Hubertl 02:31, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose overexposed sky. --Iifar 17:56, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
  • ✓ Fixed Yes, you're right. I just improved the sky.--XRay 06:29, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment I don't think you can save it. The sky is still blown, with signs of posterization. --Iifar 10:54, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --MB-one 14:07, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment It looks tilted (see the steps)--Jebulon 17:01, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
  • ✓ Fixed It's better now, but not easy. A lines are (in real) neither horizontal nor vertical, although they should be. --XRay 10:57, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 08:09, 24 October 2015 (UTC)