Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 23 2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Trier_Domfreihof_BW_2018-05-12_16-54-31.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Trier, Domfreihof 2 --Berthold Werner 14:09, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --GT1976 14:58, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Probably needs a horizontal perspective correction --Trougnouf 15:01, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support - Maybe I'm missing something, but it looks normal to me. It's also a sharp photo. -- Ikan Kekek 08:57, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment The roof is leaning down \ pretty significantly imo, that doesn't usually happen in real life where only the street level leans. If that building isn't an anomaly the picture is tilted and/or the camera was slightly off-center, either way it's an easy fix. --Trougnouf 10:51, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Possible that the facade does not run at right angles to the viewing axis. --Milseburg 11:15, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Basotxerri 15:57, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Facade_Stadtpfarrkirche_Lindenberg.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Facade of Stadtpfarrkirche in Lindenberg.--Peulle 10:25, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Syed07 13:49, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Neutral I think it needs perspective correction and there seems to be room for it --Trougnouf 14:52, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support - Not everything needs perspective correction. Photographer's choice. And very good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:58, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
It is part of the technical requirements and something I very much like about QIC (I didn't really know perspective correction was a thing before). --Trougnouf 10:57, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
  • Normally, you'd be correct, but there are angles at which the perspective should not be corrected since it's part of the composition. The typical example is when taking photos of a tall building from very close distance. See the category quality images by perspective for examples.--Peulle 12:50, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
The image needs a correction, it is tilted CCW. But the verticals should not be vertical for this point of view. --XRay 12:47, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
  • Thanks, I'll correct the slight tilt post haste.--Peulle (talk) 12:50, 19 October 2018 (UTC) ✓ Done :)
  •  Support IMO OK now. Thank you. --XRay 05:41, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg 13:02, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Renault_Nervasport,_Paris_Motor_Show_2018,_Paris_(1Y7A0475).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Renault Nervasport record vehicle at Mondiale Paris Motor Show 2018 --MB-one 08:27, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Too many problems with the people in back ... unsharp, motion blur, distortion. Also the purplish light on the bright blue car doesn't do it any favors --Daniel Case 17:53, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
  • I don't see how a blurry background is a problem. I would like to hear more opinions. --MB-one 20:10, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - Yes, the car is sharp, but the motion-blurred man just in back of the middle of the car is too distracting for me to consider this a QI. -- Ikan Kekek 09:02, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 08:36, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Morris_dancers_York_8667.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Morris dancers performing in York (June 2018) by User:Peter K Burian --Rodhullandemu 08:47, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Sorry but I don't think the sharpness is sufficient for an image of this fairly low resolution. We expect more from a quality image in 2018.--Peulle 09:05, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Quite good for a moving group of dancers --Ermell 20:11, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Nice scene, but focus appears to be on the background, sorry. --Smial 09:54, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 08:37, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Ciaspolatore_e_Rifugio_Cazzaniga_Merlini,_Piani_di_Artavaggio_(Lecco,_Lombardia)_1649_m.s.l.m._innevati._2016-03-19.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Snowshoe hiker on Piani di Artavaggio mountain, Italy. --Mænsard vokser 17:13, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good to me. --Ximonic 18:14, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Noisy sky and a bit tilted --Trougnouf 08:37, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Trougnouf; there's also purple CA. Seeing that it's a compact camera, I'm not too surprised.--Peulle 06:33, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek 21:52, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 08:37, 22 October 2018 (UTC)