Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 18 2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Scania_truck_cockpit,_DRIVE._Volkswagen_Group_Forum,_Berlin_(1X7A3953).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Scania truck cockpit, 70 Years Porsche, DRIVE. Volkswagen Group Forum --MB-one 18:41, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose I'm afraid the technical quality leaves something to be desired here, re the sharpness especially. Also, the file name and description just confuse me.--Peulle 23:30, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support IMO sharp enough for Q1 (right corner is not blurred) and the description does not confuse me --Michielverbeek 08:37, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support - I'd support sharpening this, but I do think it's sufficiently sharp at 300% of my laptop screen to be minimally acceptable for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 09:10, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
  • @Peulle: thanks for the review. Tried to fix the description and the file name. --MB-one 10:28, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Basotxerri 17:59, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Saint_Dionysius_Church_of_Berbiguieres_03.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Saint Dionysius Church of Berbiguieres, Dordogne, France. --Tournasol7 05:54, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Too bad about the car. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 06:00, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose IMHO the crop is too tight to the left. Please discuss. --C messier 15:13, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per C messier, and with that cropped car it isn't a QI for me either. --Basotxerri 08:01, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 07:11, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Bamberg_Feldhüterhäuschen_9111465.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Field guard's cottage near Burgheimer location in Bamberg --Ermell 06:33, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose A weak oppose for the out of focus foreground branch hidding part of the chimney. --C messier 16:20, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
  • The object of criticism here, I believe, is the technical execution. The cottage cannot be photographed differently because it stands on private ground. --Ermell 12:50, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment IMHO, you could move the small branch out of the frame. --C messier 16:07, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for me. --Basotxerri 07:58, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support - Me too. -- Ikan Kekek 09:24, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support ungrateful motive photographed in good quality. Ok for QI to me. --Carschten 12:56, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Basotxerri 17:57, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Würzburg,_Eichhornstraße_--_2018_--_0240.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Light of a bench, Eichhornstraße, Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany --XRay 04:26, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose What does this picture want to show? --Ermell 06:40, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
 Comment I improved the description, it is a light of a bench. --XRay 04:45, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This is a nice and pretty abstract shot but I'm missing a defined area of sharpness here. --Basotxerri 08:10, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support - IMO, abstract pictures have a form and an affect and don't have to be sharp. And enough of this is sharp at 300% of my laptop screen, anyway. -- Ikan Kekek 08:26, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support I like this picture :^) --Cvmontuy 13:40, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Nothing is sharp.--Peulle 23:34, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Oh, there are perfectly sharp areas, but these are in very dark areas of the image. So though the image is very well composed, I need to decline because of wrong focus, sorry. Also some green CA. Focus should have been somewhere on the edge between black and white. --Smial 11:06, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 11:46, 17 October 2018 (UTC)