Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 14 2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Mausolée_hexagonal_de_Haidra_01.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Hexagonal Mausoleum in Haidra in Kasserine --IssamBarhoumi 09:13, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:22, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. The perspective has to be corrected, see background. --Basotxerri 18:12, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment dear Basotxerri I fixed it have a look please --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 07:38, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
  • OK, I've removed by vote. --Basotxerri 17:18, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 23:33, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Exterior_of_the_Castle_of_Valencay_07.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Exterior of the Castle of Valençay, Indre, France. --Tournasol7 06:14, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment If you could crop out some of the foreground it might work. --Ermell 06:56, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. Beautiful perspective that this castle lost in the greenery --Ercé 07:46, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. --Ermell 06:31, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support - The composition is somewhat unusual, at least for Commons, but I think it's fine. -- Ikan Kekek 10:21, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support And a pro from me. --Granada 15:46, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sky way to much darkened, sorry. Bright edge at the trees. I do not understand, why so many images get destroyed by overprocessing and unnecessary "drama". In all other aspects acceptable quality and also full support for the composition. --Smial 18:51, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment It's not destroyed by overprocessing. It was really a rainy day. Tournasol7 07:11, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Basotxerri 07:38, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Civic_Center,_Shenzhen_Lianhuashan_Park_(2018.9)_Daytime.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Civic Center, Shenzhen Lianhuashan Park,China (2018.9) Daytime.jpg Sparktour 01:22, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:52, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  OpposeNoisy, and clouds not processed well --Daniel Case 05:30, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment Modified to observe the criteria of Quality image.Sparktour 13:49, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It is a little bit noisy, but mostly ... does this look oversaturated to you guys?--Peulle 14:12, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Modified once again. :-) Sparktour 09:01, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose overprocessed. What was the problem with the very first version? --Smial 16:06, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - All the buildings look too blue. The color looks more normal in the original version - which also, strangely, has completely different clouds. -- Ikan Kekek 23:56, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Reverted :-) Sparktour 13:37, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Imo good enough. --Smial 18:54, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support per Smial. The buildings aren't that sharp, but I think that's because of smog as much as distance. The leftmost buildings leaning left may trouble some people, but I think it's OK. -- Ikan Kekek 01:25, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Basotxerri 07:39, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Utsidan_av_Glömminge_kyrka_2016_2.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination The church Glömminge kyrka (Glömminge kyrka 1:1) in Sweden. --Jopparn 10:18, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment Perspective correction needed.--Peulle 10:27, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Touzrimounir 10:42, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose No. And @Touzrimounir: it is generally regarded as polite to wait for the first reviewer's concerns be addressed before overruling, or at least send the image to Consensual Review if you disagree, not just overruling and promoting.--Peulle 14:03, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment I made an attempt to improve the perspective. Is it working for you? Thank you for the feedback, Jopparn 13:16, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
  • @Jopparn: No, you haven't corrected it sufficiently. I've left you a note on your image page. Do you think that you can get this right? There is a corresponding function in GIMP, too. --Basotxerri 14:05, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose As it seems that this won't be done. --Basotxerri 18:44, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Basotxerri 07:38, 13 October 2018 (UTC)