Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 11 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Sankt_Jakob_im_Rosental_Maria_Elend_Wallfahrtskirche_Maria_Elend_nordseitiger_Kapellenanbau_26092023_4491.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Chapel at the north side of the parish and pilgrimage church Mary Misery in Maria Elend, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:31, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Oppose Too much noise --Plozessor 03:12, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
     Support Noise can be reduced, yes, but good enough. --XRay 04:02, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
    ✓ Done @XRay: Thanks for your review. I reduced the noise and uploaded a new version. —- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support New version has also better exposure ;-) --Smial 23:15, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 06:27, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Ebro_river_in_Brinas_(2).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Ebro river in Brinas, La Rioja, Spain. --Tournasol7 04:10, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality,--Famberhorst 04:55, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
     Oppose too dark --Charlesjsharp 08:37, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for me -- Johann Jaritz 16:25, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support meets QI criteria imho --Virtual-Pano 20:15, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support A rainy day with low contrasts, I would expect just such a photo. Of course, you could fiddle with various sliders in the image editor to add more contrast, colour and whatnot, but would that still be true to nature? --Smial 23:33, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 06:27, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

File:2023_Mazda2_(DJ)_1X7A0864.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Mazda2 (DJ) on sale in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 07:37, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose. Unfavorable light on the windshield, annoying information sheets behind it, also annoying adhesive plaster on the side, unpleasant surroundings. In my opinion this is not a quality picture. But perhaps others will have a different opinion. That's why I ask for discussion. -- Spurzem 18:23, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Spurzem. --Smial 10:27, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment This image does not show a car as we are used to see it on the roads, therefore e.g. the rim locks are missing or many protective measures are visible. It seems to come directly from the harbour (Antwerp?) and has to be prepared for delivery.--Alexander-93 (talk) 11:23, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support OK to me. Stickers and so on are what they are. Reflections are not so bothersome as to be disqualifying, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 17:13, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose completly agree with Ikan's opinion regarding sticker and reflection - the composition is not on QI level though imho, sorry --Virtual-Pano 20:02, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 06:27, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Kreta_(GR),_Rethymno,_Alter_Hafen_--_2023_--_8358.jpg[edit]

Sure it could illustrate an article about this technique. But there are more suitable motifs than this harbor entrance. This one isn't suitiblel in my eyes. I don't understand the point of showing this motif in this way. --Milseburg 11:42, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for your review. According to our set of rules, you may be right. However, sharpness is not a criterion in this kind of photography. We should perhaps get used to the idea that there may be other images that meet quality criteria. Photography is a wide field and we do not refer here only to documentary photography. I am glad about all supporters of photography who also consider and promote the artistic side. Admittedly, art has many aspects and might be difficult to evaluate. --XRay 10:19, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I understand your POV, I am passionate about endurance racing, and I enjoy to look at some photographies of race cars very blurred by the motion. But here, this is not a car, this is an architecture image, and landscape image. Here we can't see anything. There is no interesting things in this picture for this kind of subject to me. Sorry for my bad level of english. I hope you understand my POV too. --Sebring12Hrs 14:33, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 7 oppose → Decline?   --MB-one 12:35, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Handover,_Wikimania_2023,_Singapore_(P1110107).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Wikimania handover ESEAP to CEE during the closing ceremony of Wikimania 2023 --MB-one 21:15, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Sorry: truncated object, invalid category (redlink). --F. Riedelio 13:15, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment New crop and removed red category. --MB-one 21:02, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Bad white balance. --F. Riedelio 10:06, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
    • @F. Riedelio:  Question A little more information would be helpful. Is it too warm, too cold, or wrong tint? Thanks in advance. --MB-one 11:44, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
    • ✓ Answered The color temperature is IMO too warm (too high). Adjusting the white balance I would select the "white" area as the range and reduce the color temperature (yellow to blue) by 25% and the tint (green to magenta) by 20%. --F. Riedelio 13:39, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
      • ✓ Done Thanks again. I tried your suggested values, but it came out way too green, so I settled on a compromise. IMO, now people's faces seem correctly colored. Please note, that the slide background on the right is supposed to be sligtly reddish/pink, not neutral. --MB-one 09:47, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
        • ✓ Answered The skin tones are good now. --F. Riedelio 06:15, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Dunno, I guess it might be a tad red, but it looks good to me. -- Ikan Kekek 05:01, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 06:26, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

File:AC_BD_Mauerstraße_22.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Cultural heritage monument in Aachen --Grunpfnul 09:57, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Noisy sky. Otherwise good --MB-one 13:07, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Ok to me. --Sebring12Hrs 23:41, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good image, I see no lack. -- Spurzem 16:19, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Noise should be cleaned from sky. --Nino Verde (talk) 13:18, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. Sky is not too noisy. -- Ikan Kekek 04:59, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support OK to me. -- Johann Jaritz 16:30, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 06:26, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

File:GAZ-24_orange_colored_(front_view).jpg_[edit]

  • Nomination GAZ-24 "Volga". --Kirill Borisenko 18:56, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 06:33, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose. The car is distorted and the white rectangles instead of license plates are unsightly. Please discuss whether it is still a quality image. -- Spurzem 11:50, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
     Neutral No any problem with car plates. There is no requirements for them and they can be removed. Also, the quality of image is good, i do not see any hard distortion. --Nino Verde 12:50, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
    I withdraw my vote, background verticals not straight. --Nino Verde (talk) 13:40, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The license plates and the perspective aren't a problem to me, but the image has posterization effects, due to aggressive denoising. Sorry. --MB-one 12:53, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support I can't detect posterization and entry meets QI criteria for me --Virtual-Pano 17:34, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support The deletion of the license plates might be a little weird, but the photo is OK to me. -- Ikan Kekek 04:51, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose I like the composition with all the odd SUVs parking around the Volga, but the verticals should be fixed and the deletion of the Range-Rover-license plate should be done in a better way.--Alexander-93 11:25, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support OK to me. -- Johann Jaritz 16:31, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 06:25, 10 October 2023 (UTC)