Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 11 2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:La_Iglesia_Azul,_Bratislava,_Eslovaquia,_2020-02-01,_DD_38.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Blue Church, Bratislava, Slovakia --Poco a poco 06:38, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose interessting perspective. But the upper part of the building is unsharp. --Augustgeyler 08:26, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment I adressed the issue, looks like a solid QI to me now --Poco a poco 17:59, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler (talk) 21:52, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Ratargul_0315.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Ratargul Swamp Forest, aerial photograph. By User:Abdulmominbd --2simple 11:22, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment Too much denoising --Poco a poco 13:28, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough for QI. --Palauenc05 11:11, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Very good perspective. But I am with Poco, to much detail is lost.--Augustgeyler 08:00, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry. Not only the denoising is a problem, it is also the sharpening: fine structures are removed (because they are confused with noise) and other structures are over-emphasized; e.g. the water and the leaves look quite artifical. It’s a pity, this is a common problem with drone (and mobile phone) photos. --Aristeas 13:02, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 14:20, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

File:ILA_2018,_Schönefeld_(1X7A5268).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Aircraft engine part at ILA 2018, Schönefeld --MB-one 09:47, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment some distraction from the wheel and turbine blades can easily be removed by cropping (e.g. pipeing on the left, feet on the right) --Virtual-Pano 23:13, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
✓ Done --MB-one 13:33, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Weak support excellent exposure and detail but unfortunately the point of view is simply not ideal (not counted: signature is missing)
  •  Weak oppose technically well done I think, an engine part wich is shown separatelly should not show distracting background. --Augustgeyler 14:00, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Christian Ferrer 08:55, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Bad background. --Kallerna 20:01, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others. It's also not sharp at full size, but I don't know how big a part this is (though it would be good to note that in your file description), so that's not taking part in my vote. -- Ikan Kekek 05:48, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per above, wrong POV Poco a poco 18:03, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Weak support excellent exposure and detail but unfortunately the point of view is simply not ideal, sorry for the messed up signature above --Virtual-Pano 22:03, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 22:05, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

File:2020_Folwark_w_Krzyżowej,_pralnia_1.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Folwark in Krzyżowa 1 --Jacek Halicki 07:31, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Shadows on the ground are too dark for me, sorry --NeoMeesje 08:23, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Not that dark on my 13-inch monitor; maybe a bit dark on the bush but not enough of a reason to decline in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 11:05, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support The photo is overall good to me, even if raising the shadows would definitely make it better in my opinion. --Lion-hearted85 11:32, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose The shadows are distracting, making it hard to see the garden of that house. --Augustgeyler 08:08, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality - the garden is a peripheral aspect of this image and raising the shadows could possibly distract from the primary subject --SM1 (talk)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 22:00, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Fuente_de_San_Mang,_Kempten,_Alemania,_2019-06-21,_DD_142.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination St Mang Fountain, Kempten, Germany --Poco a poco 07:22, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 08:09, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Some houses in the background are too distorted and the sky in the upper part is too bright, no sky for QI as I think. Please discuss -- Spurzem 14:28, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
    The houses play no essential role here, but I improved them with an adjustment of aspect ratio Poco a poco 19:51, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
  • the frame is unchanged and still shows an awkward aspect ratio of bell and cars to the left as mentioned by Spurzem (frozen due to WLM 2020 participation?)--Virtual-Pano (talk) 20:10, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Sorry, something went wrong here, will upload the new version later today Poco a poco 07:38, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done File uploaded now Poco a poco 19:16, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support after changes have been done --Virtual-Pano 22:17, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support We have white skys even in Italy sometimes. There is nothing wrong with it --Moroder 00:54, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose I really like that composition and the sky is good, but I am with Spurzem in terms of background. Especially the left houses are showing this artefact. --Augustgeyler 14:05, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
  • As said, there is a new version, --Poco a poco 07:48, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment New version did not improve it. The main object is now heavily compressed. --Augustgeyler 08:00, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support New version improved a lot. If I look at some elements in the background (VW-Bus, traffic signs), the first version was way to much stretched horizontally. Now the background parts look realistic, so I expect the proportions of the fountain itself also realistic. --Smial 10:23, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:52, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 14:19, 10 October 2020 (UTC)