Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 09 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Row_of_round_tables_and_doors_in_restaurant_of_Amantaka_luxury_Resort_&_Hotel_in_Luang_Prabang_Laos.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Row of round wooden tables and doors in the restaurant of Amantaka luxury resort and hotel in Luang Prabang, Laos, serving breakfasts, lunches and dinners. --Basile Morin 03:08, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:55, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
     Oppose Bad composition. Important objects are not placed in the frame. --Kirill Borisenko 20:22, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
     Support Good for me, composition ist more than good -- Grunpfnul 07:15, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
     Support I like the composition as well.--Alexander-93 (talk) 09:35, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
     Support Good quality and composition imo. --ArildV 07:49, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Very good composition and quality. -- Ikan Kekek 05:05, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  SupportAnna.Massini 14:48, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Anna.MassiniAnna.Massini 14:48, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Mike Peel 19:38, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Pescara_-_Cattedrale_di_San_Cetteo_-_2023-09-27_15-11-27_001.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination San Cetteo Cathedral, Pescara, Italy. Details. --Terragio67 17:18, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
    May I ask for a more specific category? Poco a poco 21:09, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
    Thx, at the moment, I've just added the Cat. Reliefs of the Tetramorph --Terragio67 18:56, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose For such a close up; I think too less details. --Hillopo2018 09:42, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
    Please, try to explain better your opposing reasons. --Terragio67 18:56, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. I don't understand the criticism. -- Spurzem 13:33, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good Quality for me. --F. Riedelio 07:19, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support OK to me, too. -- Ikan Kekek 04:53, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  SupportAnna.Massini 14:51, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Anna.MassiniAnna.Massini 14:51, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 19:32, 8 October 2023 (UTC)