Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 09 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Cygnus_olor_(Cygne_tuberculé)_-_239.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Cygnus olor (Mute Swan) in Annecy, France --Medium69 15:32, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose just not sharp enough and lighting not right. Charlesjsharp 13:47, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Sharpness is good and light IMHO, acceptable. Please, discuss. --C messier 13:57, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sharpness is good but the lighting is not ideal.--Ermell 12:48, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support as for C messier -- Smial 07:30, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose As above. Alvesgaspar 17:27, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Hubertl 23:23, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Cygnus_olor_(Cygne_tuberculé)_-_210.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Cygnus olor (Mute Swan); a young cygneau in Annecy, France --Medium69 08:55, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose just not sharp enough. Charlesjsharp 13:50, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support IMHO, sharp enough (actually very sharp). --C messier 13:54, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sharp enough, but clipping highlights in essential areas. -- Smial 07:32, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Overexposed. Alvesgaspar 17:27, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 23:22, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Kankalini_Temple_Bhardha_Saptari_21.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Hawankund at Kankalini Temple NP-SAP-02 --Bijay chaurasia 07:00, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Distortion. You might want to discuss, as I would like to know how much distortion is too much and how much is acceptable. -- RaboKarbakian 13:04, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment I'm not sure if the building is rectilinear for real. (this isn't a support vote) --C messier 14:18, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose CA, oversaturated. -- Smial 10:03, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 23:22, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Palmhuset_September_2015_03.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Historic palm green house. --ArildV 06:38, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Strange perspective --Ermell 09:52, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree in this case, using 16mm is in fact something special, not everything must set to straight lines. --Hubertl 10:20, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Could be a tiny little bit brighter in the mid tones. Otherwise perfect. -- Smial 15:32, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The picture is distorted. That should be corrected (It's no problem). Also it is much too dark. --Hockei 15:39, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support as Smial. --Ralf Roletschek 17:19, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Connorlong90 03:15, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
    •  Comment @Connorlong90: : please give a short explanation for your vote, thx. -- Smial 13:12, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
    • Sorry, new to the QI page. I like this picture. I think the subject matter is interesting and I do not notice a distortion that I would deem unacceptable or distracting. I second Hubertl. Connorlong90 (talk) 01:46, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
      • Thx again ;-) -- Smial 10:13, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 23:20, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

File:The Orangery, Kew Gardens.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination The Orangery, Kew Gardens --Daniel Case 05:19, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Hubertl 05:29, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Perspective issues, slight CA, oversaturated colors. --Smial 13:01, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose as Smial --Ralf Roletschek 00:33, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Connorlong90 03:17, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
    •  Comment @Connorlong90: : please give a short explanation for your vote, thx. -- Smial 13:14, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
    • Good quality -- Connorlong90 01:48, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
  • @Daniel Case: if you correct the perspective at left, and the very slight CA in the tree at right, you'll get my support.--Jebulon 20:17, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but I agree regarding perspective. Also the building is too bright for me (small overexposure too) and I have the feel, there is either a bit(!) too much turf or too little sky. Everything can be fixed. --Hockei 15:34, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Oversaturated. --Iifar 09:48, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 23:19, 8 October 2015 (UTC)