Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 08 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:20190906_Karlsruhe_Palace_02.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Exterior of the Karlsruhe palace --FlocciNivis 16:51, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment Looks a bit overprocessed (to much contrast for a start), dust spot on the right, disturbing shadow in the bottom left corner, too much uninteresting foreground --Poco a poco 19:32, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done @Poco a poco: I tried to fix most of the things you mentioned, but I don't want to crop away the foreground to make the image less uninteresting --FlocciNivis 20:36, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
      • Ok, but can you lighten up the shadows a bit and fix the current cw tilt? --Poco a poco 07:04, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
        • ✓ Done @Poco a poco: I lighted up the shadows now and did a small tilt acw. I hope I fixed the tilt you were talking about. Thank you for all the feedback btw --FlocciNivis 17:13, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:12, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The uninteresting foreground is to dominant and spoils it. --Milseburg 19:57, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Over-processed (aliasing ?) at right and blurry at right. --Sebring12Hrs 07:59, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:46, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Handorf_Hauptstraße_Turm_005_2021_06_21.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Former bell tower in Handorf (Lower Saxony), built probably in the 17th century, view from north
    --F. Riedelio 07:07, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment The upper part is blurred. --Sebring12Hrs 07:37, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
    • ✓ New version Improved. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 09:30, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I think the upper part is too noisy still. There is some aberration there. --Satdeep Gill 06:54, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree. Above the QI-bar in my eyes. --Milseburg 13:35, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The upper part was improved, but the image is too much over-processed IMO. --Sebring12Hrs 09:07, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, in my opinion this image is over processed. Vincent Vega 18:02, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:47, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Noordflank_van_de_Vorderrhein_15-09-2022._(d.j.b)_04.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Clouds over the north flank of the Vorderrhein from Breil-Brigels (Graubünden).--Famberhorst 05:36, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:37, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. The composition is not succeeded here. We see nothing of the Vorderrhein here and hardly any mountain flanks, but instead a lot of gray sky and clouds. --Milseburg 10:38, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Milseburg. --Sebring12Hrs 08:10, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:48, 7 October 2022 (UTC)