Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 05 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Rethymno_old_harbour_panorama_2.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Rethymno old harbour at sunrize -- Nino Verde 08:44, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --SHB2000 03:27, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  OpposeI think, you need to delete boats from right bottom corner for good composition. --Kirill Borisenko 20:13, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Sometimes it is better to leave objects that are not highly distractive to allow others make derivative work with composition they like. And cropping image requires more space obviously. This is the reason. --Nino Verde (talk) 08:55, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Quality is good in my view. High level of detail -- Basile Morin 07:56, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Easily good enough for QI. BigDom 12:12, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 16:48, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

File:009_2015_08_27_Kulturdenkmaeler_Hassloch.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination 2015 08 27 Kulturdenkmaeler Hassloch (by F. Riedelio) --Sebring12Hrs 09:10, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Soory, but too soft. --MB-one 15:59, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support. Good quality. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 13:03, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality, I don't see any reason to discuss this one too much. --多多123 15:42, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment MB-one is right. There is something wrong with this image, as if it has been upscaled or there was a loss of data during exporting or uploading and the end image appears soft. --C messier 20:20, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support OK to me. -- Ikan Kekek 21:31, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per C messier --Jakubhal 04:39, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per C messier Charlesjsharp 08:42, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unsharp. The new version is much better. I hesitate to give it a supporting vote due to what C messier mentioned, but I'll remove my opposing vote.
  •  Support It's good now. ReneeWrites (talk) 22:28, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
  • ✓ New version Improved. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 16:24, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment The new version has banding in the sky. --C messier 18:57, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
  • ✓ New version Sky improved. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 07:27, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support OK now. --C messier 16:28, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good now. Thank you! --MB-one 11:23, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 16:49, 4 October 2023 (UTC)