Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 01 2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:落日的旗津擱淺漁船.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination This sunset image of a fishing vessel aground at Cijin Island Beach, Kaohsiung Taiwan image was entered in the Wikimedia Commons Photo Challenge for September by User:Xiaoyang 2018. I feel it exhibits a high degree of technical merit and support it being considered for QI. --GRDN711 17:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment If this is an HDR merge, I don't think it's worked. It's not sharp at full resolution and has fringes and jumps (annotated) and 4.2Mb for such a picture seems small. Can these be fixed? Rodhullandemu 17:56, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
    • The image is sufficiently sharp on the ship where it needs to be in a lighting situation that is challenging. Other areas like the water in the foreground are not intended to be crispy. The HDR merge issues are minor and not distracting. I will leave it to the original photographer to make any further changes but feel the image merits QI as is. --GRDN711 18:33, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but the photo is not remotely related to QI. Not only the ship in the foreground but all ships have completely blurred contours, nothing is clearly visible. I'm also wondering how to shoot this with 1 second exposure time? --Steindy 18:59, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
    • Thank you for your comments. Let's put this into CR to see if there is consensus. --GRDN711 01:01, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, this is a very nice photo, but enlarged to full resolution does not meet the QI standards. The ship is not sharp. Also, there are some green chromatic aberrations on the ship edges. --Jakubhal 05:51, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Milseburg 12:15, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Cemetery_Medzibizh_04.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Jewish cemetery in Medziboj (by Mummik) --Andrew J.Kurbiko 16:22, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:48, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I think it need to fix the vertical perspective a bit. --Armenak Margarian 14:52, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
  •  Infokeep in mind that they are leaning in different sides and naturally are not vertical --Andrew J.Kurbiko, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment User:Andrew J.Kurbiko I think you need a litte bit corrected highlight and left crop, at least you can put the left stone vertically straight. It's my opinion, sorry. I want corrected and really good quality photo. --Armenak Margarian (talk) 07:36, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Old gravestones are never correctly in the balance. --Steindy 11:45, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg 12:11, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Cisne_(Cygnus_olor)_en_el_Palacio_de_Nymphenburg,_Múnich,_Alemania33.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Swan (Cygnus olor) at the Nymphenburg Palace, Munich, Germany --Poco a poco 18:08, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good focus to the head --Michielverbeek 18:51, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry but it looks quite dark to me and I think the water at the top should be cropped out --Podzemnik 00:25, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Seems downsized, despite the wide crop.--Peulle 11:36, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment Brigther version and new crop Poco a poco 19:21, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Still too small for me, sorry.--Peulle 07:01, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Now good for me --Armenak Margarian 20:18, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose --Kallerna 09:15, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Yeah good focus on the head, but I'd like to see the whole body. Masum Reza📞 12:25, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
    User:Masumrezarock100, your review has nothing to do with QI criterias, please, review them to understand how to review Poco a poco 16:42, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
    Sorry for replying late, I didn't get the ping. If I take look at the photo, I can only see the sea, the throat and the head. The backrou view should have more content IMO. Masum Reza📞 00:06, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality for me. --Manfred Kuzel 04:33, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Milseburg 12:10, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Grue demoiselle (Grus virgo) (animal).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Unidentified bird at zooParc in Beauval (Saint-Aignan, Loir-et-Cher, France). --Gzen92 08:38, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Composition. Crop needed. --Till.niermann 08:56, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
    ✓ Done cropping. Gzen92 06:48, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support --Moroder 07:15, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 08:20, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose poor quality and why submit a nomination when you haven't bothered to identify the bird? Charlesjsharp 15:31, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose bird needs identification (prerequisite), but despite that there are blown whites and artifacts. Quality isn't good enough for QI. --Carschten 11:30, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Milseburg 12:09, 30 September 2019 (UTC)