Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 23 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:20200115_Altes_Casino_Burbach.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination The Old Casino in Saarbrücken-Burbach --FlocciNivis 10:25, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Is it possible to fix top crop? It is too tight, even though the building top isn't cropped. --C messier 17:40, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
    I could extend the area of the sky above the building by about 2/3s, but not without cropping it on the left. Would that be sufficient? --FlocciNivis 10:52, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
    Cropping the building doesn't sound right. --C messier 21:35, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
    The building itself wouldn't be cropped but the street and the left. But still, in my honest opinion it would not be an improvement, as only a few pixels would be won on top, but more of the left border lost --FlocciNivis 21:56, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
     Support The picture is very sharp and perspective is good. The area of the sky could have been bigger, but it's good overall. --Sebring12Hrs 09:26, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Yes, very good, and I don't agree with the objection. We sometimes try to enforce too much uniformity. This amount of sky above the building is fine to me. -- Ikan Kekek 17:55, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support A bit of an odd composition with only a small amount of sky but it's not so tight that any of the building is cut off and there's nothing wrong with the quality of the image. --BigDom 23:35, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 07:44, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Los_Angeles,_California_(September_10,_2022)_-_291.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Hollywood Forever Cemetery, Los Angeles, California --Another Believer 05:43, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Can you expand the description a bit? --FlocciNivis 10:13, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
    I've added "Hollywood Forever Cemetery" to the Description. -Another Believer 17:20, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
    Thank you! I have to say though that for me the detail is too low, but I don't overhasty judge it, as this might be my personal taste. I would like to get some additional opinions on it --FlocciNivis 10:47, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose FlocciNivis, you didn't need to move it here. That said, I agree that it's not sharp enough. Next time, consider going with your opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 16:59, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 07:43, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Noordflank_van_de_Vorderrhein_15-09-2022._(d.j.b)_03.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Clouds over the Mountainsides of Breil-Brigels (Graubünden).
    --Famberhorst 06:31, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline Check the WB. Clouds look quite purple. --Milseburg 21:40, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done. Correction. Thank you for your reviews.--Famberhorst 06:34, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
    • Different, but not really better. In my eyes magenta is too dominant now. I edited the image using Photoshop's automatic color correction. May I overwrite it to make clear what I mean. You can revert afterwards. --Milseburg 15:01, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
      • Answer: That's fine. Many thanks in advance.--Famberhorst 17:42, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
        • ✓ Done Just a proposal. Feel free to revert. --Milseburg 17:52, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
          • An absolute improvement! Thank you for this service. Kind regards from Friesland.--Famberhorst 18:11, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
            • As I'm involved now, we need a third person to judge. Send it into CR in a few days if no one find it here. --Milseburg 15:32, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
              • Fine. Thank you.--Famberhorst 17:43, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
                • Would like more opinions.--Famberhorst 06:16, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It's too much noisy to me. Sorry. --Sebring12Hrs 20:45, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support. There is definitely some image noise in there, but I wouldn't call it excessive, and at a normal viewing distance it is not yet annoyingly noticeable. --Smial 10:25, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose sorry, I agree with Sebring12Hrs that it's too noisy. Mike Peel 18:35, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 07:43, 22 November 2022 (UTC)