Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 20 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Свято-Пантелеймонівський_собор_ввечері.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Свято-Пантелеимоновский собор, Киев, ул. Академика Лебедева, 25. Памятник архитектуры и градостроительства местного значения, охранный номер 436-Кв.Українська: Свято-Пантелеймонівський собор, Київ, вул. Лебедєва Академіка, 25. Пам'ятка архітектури і містобудування місцевого значення, охоронний номер 436-Кв. By User:Alexkrol --Ahonc 21:52, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:21, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too much noise, tilt on the left side. --Berthold Werner 15:13, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - Noise level might be OK, but agreed on the tilt - please correct that. -- Ikan Kekek 10:43, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --PumpkinSky 12:50, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Phare de Sayada, 14 novembre 2017 DSC 6994.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Lighthouse of Saydada --Dyolf77 10:12, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality, Tournasol7 11:26, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I'm sorry but in my opinion not sharp enough. --Սարո Հովհաննիսյան 11:46, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I agree.--Peulle 09:23, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 11:30, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Seestrasse_und_Nikolaikirche_Stralsund.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Seestrasse and St. Nicholas' Church in Stralsund (Oct. 2015) --JoachimKohlerBremen 09:03, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose - Quite beautiful, but I regret that it is in my opinion not sharp enough. -- Ikan Kekek 02:12, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Resolution could be higher but the sharpness is o.k. IMO --Ermell 09:47, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support I think this image is reaching the quality level for night shots. --Milseburg 12:40, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Could be sharper but OK for QI, I think.--Peulle 11:24, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment Why the reduced resolution? Noise is still present and some details are lost. The full resolution versions are imho sharp enough for QI with acceptable noise. Landscapes (and cityscapes) should have at least 6 MPixels nowadays. --Smial 01:50, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --PumpkinSky 12:51, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Reforma_skullsp3.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Temporary exhibition of skulls made by several Mexican artists to commemorate the day of the dead, on Paseo de la Reforma, Mexico City. --Cvmontuy 21:01, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose It´s a 40:/60! Quality is good enough. For me, it´s a snap, not a fotographers work. For Q1 enough, like a lot of snaps here. Go ahead! --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 19:36, 14 November 2017 (UTC
  •  Comment Thanks for your review, Would you please be more specifiq about the main image issues, regards --Cvmontuy 01:28, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Matches QI standards but the person on the right should be cropped out IMO. --Ermell 09:51, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment I have croped thanks --Cvmontuy 21:24, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support PumpkinSky 15:05, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 02:56, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --PumpkinSky 12:52, 19 November 2017 (UTC)