Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 09 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:At_Singapore_2023_055_-_Lee_Kong_Chian_School_of_Business,_Singapore_Management_University.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Lee Kong Chian School of Business, Singapore Management University --Mike Peel 20:57, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Not an ideal perspective for that building ... --Plozessor 17:40, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Ok to me. --Sebring12Hrs 16:07, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support slightly increasing blurriness towards the upper edge of the image, but still within tolerable limits. Otherwise good. --Smial 10:42, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support. Good quality; I see no lack. -- Spurzem 16:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 08:12, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Balzende_Austernfischer.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination courtship display of eurasian oystercatchers --Stephan Sprinz 22:47, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:22, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but I think the bird on the right side looks too blurry. --Imehling 07:33, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Agree -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:29, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 08:10, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Vista_de_Londres,_Inglaterra,_2022-11-26,_DD_177-179_HDR.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination View of London, England --Poco a poco 08:18, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Curved horizon. --Kallerna 06:10, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment Reset to "Nomination" - this is a fixable problem. --King of Hearts 07:48, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
  • I applied a tilt and a perspective correction, along with some denoising, good now? --Poco a poco 12:04, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment Sending this to CR so that it does not get lost here. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:56, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment "reset to Nomination" because of "fixable" Problems? Did I miss or not understand something about the QI rules? --Smial 11:28, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment I think this is a good picture. The horizon is still askew though. If you fix that, I'd support it. --Plozessor 17:06, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Sorry, but I see no issue with the horizon Poco a poco 07:44, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
On the right side, the city is more than 100 pixels higher than on the left side. Is this a hill? (Otherwise this is really a great picture.) --Plozessor 10:04, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
I believe so. In some cases the horizon is bent due to lens distortion but then at both sides. That's not the case here. Poco a poco 18:18, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Tomer T 09:35, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Unsure whether the horizon is really tilted or it is an optical illusion. Thus supporting this now because it is really a great shot. --Plozessor 19:00, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 08:10, 8 November 2023 (UTC)