Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 06 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Charleroi_-_Hôtel_des_Chemins_de_Fer_-_2023-10-29_-_18.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Charleroi (Belgique) - Hôtel des Chemins de Fer --Jmh2o 19:39, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality -- Spurzem 20:26, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Buildings not really sharp and low on detail. --Tomer T 09:31, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Interesting perspective/composition. Sharpness and level of detail ok IMO. --Plozessor 17:03, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Sharp enough for a view through a closed window, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 21:14, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Mike Peel 06:42, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Provin_73_rue_nationale.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Enclosure, Rue Nationale 73, in Provin, France --Velvet 06:44, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Looks a bit overcontrasted, what do others think? --Plozessor 17:44, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
     Support Ok to me. --Sebring12Hrs 00:33, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Neutral I think the contrast is okay. But I don't see what's special about this construction site. This should be said in the image description. The composition is not the best to me. -- Spurzem 17:00, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks o.k. for QI IMO. This is not FP. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 19:11, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for the instruction, I wouldn't have come up with the idea on my own. Nevertheless, it would be interesting to find out what the purpose of this poorly designed photo is. -- Spurzem 19:29, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi Spurzem, I can understand why the image isn't particularly appealing. But it was a small pleasure for me to come across this architectural curiosity during a walk: a fence, carefully erected in a variety of more or less noble materials, which only encloses the void, and even then, not that well. As for the framing, it's the only one I could find so that none of the stone pillars is hidden in whole or in part by another. Of course, I would also have liked to place the arch at the bottom left between two pillars, but it wasn't compatible. So I had to choose. --Velvet 14:54, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Seems fine to me, and I think the description is fine: it's a particular place in a city. That documentation is quite sufficient for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 21:22, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Mike Peel 06:41, 5 November 2023 (UTC)