Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 29 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Panoramic_view_of_Como_Lake_(Lago_di_Como)_and_Bellagio_town,_seen_from_the_mountain_Monte_Grona_-_Plesio_(Como)_2015-10-25.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Panoramic over foggy Como Lake (Lago di Como) and Bellagio town (Italy) --Mænsard vokser 16:36, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:20, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I cannot believe, that these are the accurate colors and brightness before 2 pm. --Hubertl 00:45, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Very nice composition, but, sorry, nothing really sharp. @Hubertl: Sieht eher nach früh morgens oder Abenddämmerung aus, die Kamerauhr kann ja auch falsch gestellt gewesen sein. -- Smial 10:10, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment The leak of sharpness and the blue colours are both caused by fog and by the fact i took the picture from distance on a mountain top (Monte Grona summit) on the other side of the valley in wich the lake is located, so the sun was above me but on my right side and the sunshine wasn't fully reaching the lake i zoomed in on (because of other mountains on my right side "obscuring" the water in the valley bottom). As i remeber camera clock is right.--Mænsard vokser 17:27, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment I tried to reprocess it (from the jpg) - but there is no chance to bring it closer to QI criterias. In fact, its really unsharp, there is strong color noise. This motif is not made for a camera you used. Really difficult to get this mood without perfect lenses and grey filters and long exposures. That means: Tripod work. All that is just my personal opinion. But for you it´s a wonderful commemoration of this moment. See the Link on your discussion page. --Hubertl 19:41, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment Don't worry, i perfectly understand! This was one of my first ever attempt to have an image promoted as QI and was vary curious about the pics standards and the promotion process (next time i'll use tripod)! Thank you for the review.--Mænsard vokser 09:08, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 07:14, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

File:13-06-28-eindhoven-by-RalfR-07.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Eindhoven, Niederlande, Stadtzentrum --Ralf Roletschek 10:35, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 12:29, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Poor crop: too tight at the sides and above, too generous below --A.Savin 13:11, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support I think it's fine, deserves QI --Domdomegg 22:12, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unfortunately, crop at the left side is too poor --Michielverbeek 05:09, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support I dont think the crop matters that much. Image is QI for me--Ermell 07:43, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support. Somewhat tight crop, but nothing cut. OK for me. Quality is good, that's essential, as it is not an FPC nomination. -- Smial 10:17, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for the new version --A.Savin 14:39, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 07:15, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

File:NY Tannenstraße Am Januskopf.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination house at the street corner - Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany. --Nordenfan 16:07, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Hubertl 18:21, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose There are red/green CAs on the building, mostly on the windows (see the note) --Halavar 18:48, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Sharp photo, good perspective. Green CAs don't irritate me, it does not look unnatural--Michielverbeek 06:48, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose As Halavar, red/green CAs (windows...). Blurred grass. The detail is not QI IMO--Lmbuga 16:20, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality for me. --Verum 09:24, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for me. --Basotxerri 20:08, 20 May 2016 (UTC).
    •  Comment Blue color of the sky seem unnatural IMO--Lmbuga 16:22, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose visible CAs. Can be corrected. Missing the info for a HDR/tonemapping work (visible at the halos around the roof) . --Alchemist-hp 17:20, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose as for lmbuga & alchemist -- Smial 11:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Strong CAs. --C messier 13:53, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Good for me --Domdomegg 22:26, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per above: CA --Carschten 10:36, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 6 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 15:25, 28 May 2016 (UTC)