Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 18 2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Cañón_Miles,_Yukón,_Canadá,_2017-08-26,_DD_161.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Miles Canyon, Yukon, Canada --Poco a poco 18:41, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Unsharp --Daniel Case 05:36, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Info I just uploaded a new version, should be ok for QI, please, let's discuss. --Poco a poco 19:37, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  CommentLooks sharper now, but I'm still convinced that the highlights are blown out. Those in the sky and those in the waterline. --Granada 09:11, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
    Ok, I reworked the curves, please, check again Poco a poco 18:51, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
     Support Way better now and (nearly) the same result as I got from lowering the highlights on just the jpeg. --Granada 05:18, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support --Moroder 08:25, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support--Ermell 08:04, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support--GT1976 12:20, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 14:29, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Turkey_vultures_(01729)a.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination: Turkey vulture with visible nictitating membrane on a fence in Santa Rosa, California --Rhododendrites 03:13, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:37, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose i.e. its eye is shut! Not sharp enough and I feel a bird's eye should be open for QI unless it is a sharp (close up) image taken to illustrate the membrane. See what others think. Charlesjsharp 09:09, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Sharp enough for QI --Granada 11:40, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
     Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek 05:52, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Acceptable. Btw: I couldn't find a QI of this species with closed eyes. --Smial 12:58, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Dark dark -- Basile Morin 08:09, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose not only too dark for me, the subject doesn't really manage to stand out against the rest of the image. --El Grafo 13:46, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others. --Milseburg 20:54, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others. --Suisant7 15:06, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Acceptable for QIC. --Bijay chaurasia 09:08, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Acceptable for QI.--MB-one 10:01, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others.--Lmbuga 23:00, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 6 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 14:28, 17 May 2018 (UTC)