Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 15 2014

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Peterborough railway station MMB 07 43308.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination 43308 at Peterborough. Mattbuck 08:49, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support - Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:01, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment It seems tilted? --Arctic Kangaroo 13:29, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
    I have reworked this from the original JPEG, using the bridge as the vertical for tilt/perspective correction. It should be ok now. Mattbuck 22:00, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support --Graphium 08:46, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Graphium 09:49, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

File:French_Guiana_Les_Mamelles_as_from_La_Mère.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Islands of les Mamelles, French Guiana, as seen from îlet La Mère. --Cayambe 16:46, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  SupportGood quality. --JDP90 16:57, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
     Oppose IMO the photo is underexposed. --Arctic Kangaroo 06:52, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
 Question Underexposed? Do you mean overexposed? --Cayambe 06:27, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
Look at the islands...underexposed. --Arctic Kangaroo 09:07, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
Ok, I see... you are right. --Cayambe 18:52, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
 Info New version uploaded, reprocessed from the RAW file. Islands now correctly exposed, I think. --Cayambe 18:07, 5 May 2014 (UTC). The sea water is brown along the coasts of French Guiana.
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Graphium 08:48, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

File:2014-05-01_15-51-53-Idea-leuconoe-hunawihr.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Idea leuconoe --ComputerHotline 10:38, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. Please, help reviewing others' pictures --Poco a poco 12:19, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
     Oppose Overexposed at the centre and centre bottom of the butterfly. --Arctic Kangaroo 07:15, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
     Support--Uoaei1 05:53, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
     Support Its ok for me --The Photographer 03:32, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Graphium 09:54, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Peacock_Pansy,_Burdwan,_West_Bengal,_India_05_12_2012_.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination The Peacock Pansy (Junonia almana). Renomination. Reprocessed. --JDP90 10:39, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:28, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Blur. --Arctic Kangaroo 07:19, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose -- Dark, out of focus -- Alvesgaspar 13:29, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Alvesgaspar --The Photographer 03:30, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

@Graphium: You should change Discuss status to Decline or Promotion for a decline or promotion. JDP90 16:15, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Graphium 09:56, 14 May 2014 (UTC)