Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 02 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:M020F031_Neue_Hütte_(Schmalkalden).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Blast furnaces of the technical museum Neue Hütte in the city of Schmalkalden in Thuringia --Augustgeyler 11:56, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Posterization, lack of details, not sharp enough, dust spots on the sky. --Halavar 20:05, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
    •  Comment Thank you for review. I fixed the dust spots. But as this image is shot on photographic film, it is grain and not posterization. I think it is sharp. Please discuss. --Augustgeyler 04:42, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It is decent quality for film era image, and the subject is interesting, but not good enough for QI IMO. Sorry. --LexKurochkin 08:53, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support The image is good enough for a slide reproduction. Is the metadata estimated or did you write it down? --Ermell 21:09, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
    •  Comment I wrote it down. Only the shutter speed I had to guess, due to bad handwriting. Could also be 1/250. --Augustgeyler 22:59, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support. Beautiful and good image. I don't understand the very different demands when voting for QI. -- Spurzem 09:53, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Nice work, if needed some noise reduction software can improve this image. --Mister rf 10:23, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support per others --Smial 10:46, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --BigDom 20:55, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Vista_de_Kalopanagiotis,_Chipre,_2021-12-13,_DD_29.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination View of Kalopanagiotis, Cyprus --Poco a poco 18:27, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose center is looking good, but sides are looking blurry --Modern primat 21:37, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
    •  Comment Looks acceptable to me, please, let's talk. --Poco a poco 19:24, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
  •  Neutral Well, there are minor differences in sharpness comparing the centre with the outer parts, but nothing which should stop a nomination from becoming QI. I'm just not sure about the vertical correction here. The camera is tilted very much upwards, leading to more vertical correction needed. But I think many other reviewers will consider this image QI. Let's see. --Augustgeyler 20:52, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment I think this is a QI, except that the funicular railroad looks unsharp and a little discolored. Could you do something about that? -- Ikan Kekek 06:46, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment I've uploaded a new version, denoised, brigther, tigther crop, Poco a poco 10:22, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support ok for me.--Ermell 10:41, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Yes, OK. -- Ikan Kekek 18:32, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --BigDom (talk) 20:55, 1 May 2023 (UTC)