Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 01 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • * Nomination Cologne, Germany: View of Seehaus, an office building at TUV Rheinland Headquarters compound, seen from company parking lot during the refurbishing of the TÜV Tower. In the background, the crane with 130 m hook height. --Cccefalon 04:16, 29 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Very sharp photo, good perspective --Michielverbeek 04:51, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Cologne, Germany: View of Seehaus, an office building at TUV Rheinland Headquarters compound, seen from company parking lot during the refurbishing of the TÜV Tower. In the background, the crane with 130 m hook height. --Cccefalon 04:16, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Very sharp photo, good perspective --Michielverbeek 04:51, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Lahad Datu, Sabah: Cupolas of "Masjid Awam Tuan Guru Hj Muda", a public mosque in Lahad Datu --Cccefalon 04:16, 29 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:25, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Lahad Datu, Sabah: Cupolas of "Masjid Awam Tuan Guru Hj Muda", a public mosque in Lahad Datu --Cccefalon 04:16, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:25, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Papar, Sabah: Railway Bridge Papar, transisition beetween the southern pre-war construction and the post-war middle segment. --Cccefalon 04:16, 29 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:25, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Papar, Sabah: Railway Bridge Papar, transisition beetween the southern pre-war construction and the post-war middle segment. --Cccefalon 04:16, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:25, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Calle de las Siete Cruces, Quito, Ecuador --Bgag 03:35, 29 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:37, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Calle de las Siete Cruces, Quito, Ecuador --Bgag 03:35, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:37, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Flag of Quito, Quito, Ecuador --Bgag 03:35, 29 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:37, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Flag of Quito, Quito, Ecuador --Bgag 03:35, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:37, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Crucifix at the calvary of the cemetery in Tiffen, Steindorf am Ossiacher See, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:06, 29 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 03:35, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Crucifix at the calvary of the cemetery in Tiffen, Steindorf am Ossiacher See, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:06, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 03:35, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination The Crucified at the calvary cross of the cemetery in Tiffen, Steindorf am Ossiacher See, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:06, 29 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:20, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination The Crucified at the calvary cross of the cemetery in Tiffen, Steindorf am Ossiacher See, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:06, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:20, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Western part of the cemetery in Tiffen, Steindorf am Ossiacher See, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:06, 29 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:22, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Western part of the cemetery in Tiffen, Steindorf am Ossiacher See, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:06, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:22, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Town hall - Aix-les-Bains (France) (par Aurore73) --Mathis73 22:52, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Decline Some cyan chromatic aberrations. Too tight framing with roof toop piercing image border. Not a QI imo. --Cccefalon 04:19, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Town hall - Aix-les-Bains (France) (par Aurore73) --Mathis73 22:52, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Decline Some cyan chromatic aberrations. Too tight framing with roof toop piercing image border. Not a QI imo. --Cccefalon 04:19, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination La Quiñonería, Soria, Spain --Poco a poco 22:30, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 03:37, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination La Quiñonería, Soria, Spain --Poco a poco 22:30, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 03:37, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Panorama of Verona with the church of San Giorgio in Braida --Livioandronico2013 19:49, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 21:18, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Panorama of Verona with the church of San Giorgio in Braida --Livioandronico2013 19:49, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 21:18, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Ceiling of left chapel in Duomo (Verona) --Livioandronico2013 19:48, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 20:18, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Ceiling of left chapel in Duomo (Verona) --Livioandronico2013 19:48, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 20:18, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Rhapsody (ship, 1996), Sète, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 18:04, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 19:00, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Rhapsody (ship, 1996), Sète, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 18:04, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 19:00, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Vineyard cultivation near Tiagua, Lanzarote --Llez 17:59, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:52, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Vineyard cultivation near Tiagua, Lanzarote --Llez 17:59, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:52, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Part of the Museo Agrícola el Patio, Tiagua, Lanzarote --Llez 17:59, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 20:22, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Part of the Museo Agrícola el Patio, Tiagua, Lanzarote --Llez 17:59, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 20:22, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Sculpture at church of Goiáns, in the municipality of Carballo (Spain). --Elisardojm 16:31, 28 April 2016 (UTC) Comment Leaning to the left. Easy to fix.Sorry, hit the wrong picture.Mean the next one--Ermell 20:25, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 20:28, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Sculpture at church of Goiáns, in the municipality of Carballo (Spain). --Elisardojm 16:31, 28 April 2016 (UTC) Comment
      Leaning to the left. Easy to fix.Sorry, hit the wrong picture.Mean the next one--Ermell 20:25, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 20:28, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Sculpture at church of Oza, in the municipality of Carballo (Spain). --Elisardojm 16:31, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Code 17:30, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Sculpture at church of Oza, in the municipality of Carballo (Spain). --Elisardojm 16:31, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Code 17:30, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Church of Goiáns, in the municipality of Carballo (Spain). --Elisardojm 16:31, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality --Llez 18:00, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Church of Goiáns, in the municipality of Carballo (Spain). --Elisardojm 16:31, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality --Llez 18:00, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Mossy, ravaged stumps on footpath to the bird hide Schollevaar. Location, Oostvaardersplassen in the Netherlands --Famberhorst 15:40, 28 April 2016 (UTC). * Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 19:01, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Mossy, ravaged stumps on footpath to the bird hide Schollevaar. Location, Oostvaardersplassen in the Netherlands
      --Famberhorst 15:40, 28 April 2016 (UTC).
    • Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 19:01, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Swelling leaf bud of red beech Fagus sylvatica 'Purpurea'. Location, De Famberhorst in the Netherlands. --Famberhorst 15:40, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 19:01, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Swelling leaf bud of red beech Fagus sylvatica 'Purpurea'. Location, De Famberhorst in the Netherlands.
      --Famberhorst 15:40, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 19:01, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination The 'defaced' bronze bust of Rhodes at the Rhodes Memorial, South Africa. --Prosthetic Head 13:45, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion  Support good quality, nice motive --Sven Volkens 14:54, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination The 'defaced' bronze bust of Rhodes at the Rhodes Memorial, South Africa. --Prosthetic Head 13:45, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support good quality, nice motive --Sven Volkens 14:54, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination The Palazzetto Foscari on the Canal Grande in Venice. --Moroder 12:19, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality, though a bit soft. Please consider less noise reduction. --Smial 14:48, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination The Palazzetto Foscari on the Canal Grande in Venice. --Moroder 12:19, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality, though a bit soft. Please consider less noise reduction. --Smial 14:48, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination The Ruoda-Boldù palace in the middle and the Bragadin Velluti palace on the right. View from the Canal Grande in Venice. --Moroder 12:19, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 12:28, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination The Ruoda-Boldù palace in the middle and the Bragadin Velluti palace on the right. View from the Canal Grande in Venice. --Moroder 12:19, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 12:28, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination The Bragadin Velluti palace on the left and Palazzo Gussoni Grimani Della Vida on the Canal Grande in Venice. --Moroder 12:19, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality, though a bit soft. Please consider less noise reduction. --Smial 14:48, 28 April 2016 (UTC) Comment I don't do any noise reduction ever besides reducing the file size rarely. The camera does it only for long exposures which was not the case here. Thanks for the review --Moroder 17:46, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination The Bragadin Velluti palace on the left and Palazzo Gussoni Grimani Della Vida on the Canal Grande in Venice. --Moroder 12:19, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality, though a bit soft. Please consider less noise reduction. --Smial 14:48, 28 April 2016 (UTC) Comment I don't do any noise reduction ever besides reducing the file size rarely. The camera does it only for long exposures which was not the case here. Thanks for the review --Moroder 17:46, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination The palaces Palazzo Marcello, Palazzo Erizzo alla Maddalena and Palazzo Soranzo Piovene on the Canal Grande in Venice. --Moroder 12:19, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality, though a bit soft. Please consider less noise reduction. --Smial 14:48, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination The palaces Palazzo Marcello, Palazzo Erizzo alla Maddalena and Palazzo Soranzo Piovene on the Canal Grande in Venice. --Moroder 12:19, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality, though a bit soft. Please consider less noise reduction. --Smial 14:48, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination The Rio di Noale canal in Venice. --Moroder 12:15, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 12:28, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination The Rio di Noale canal in Venice. --Moroder 12:15, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 12:28, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Building of the former University Women's Hospital in Monbijoustraße 2A in Berlin-Mitte during the renovation works in 2016. --Code 10:27, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 12:28, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Building of the former University Women's Hospital in Monbijoustraße 2A in Berlin-Mitte during the renovation works in 2016. --Code 10:27, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 12:28, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Goshavank monastery. Dilijan National Park, Gosh, Tavush Province, Armenia. --Halavar 10:22, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:21, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Goshavank monastery. Dilijan National Park, Gosh, Tavush Province, Armenia. --Halavar 10:22, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:21, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Khachkar from 1291, author: Poghos. Goshavank monastery. Dilijan National Park, Gosh, Tavush Province, Armenia. --Halavar 10:22, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:57, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Khachkar from 1291, author: Poghos. Goshavank monastery. Dilijan National Park, Gosh, Tavush Province, Armenia. --Halavar 10:22, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:57, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination St. Gregory the Illuminator church. Goshavank monastery. Dilijan National Park, Gosh, Tavush Province, Armenia. --Halavar 10:22, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:21, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination St. Gregory the Illuminator church. Goshavank monastery. Dilijan National Park, Gosh, Tavush Province, Armenia. --Halavar 10:22, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:21, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Mkhitar Gosh funeral chapel. Dilijan National Park, Gosh, Tavush Province, Armenia. --Halavar 10:22, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:43, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Mkhitar Gosh funeral chapel. Dilijan National Park, Gosh, Tavush Province, Armenia. --Halavar 10:22, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:43, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Rheinschleife bei Kestert, im Hintergrund die Burgen Sterrenberg und Liebenstein --Alexander Hoernigk 09:03, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion ok. --Cccefalon 15:43, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Rheinschleife bei Kestert, im Hintergrund die Burgen Sterrenberg und Liebenstein --Alexander Hoernigk 09:03, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion ok. --Cccefalon 15:43, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Boguszów Chapel in Mielec 1 --Jacek Halicki 08:21, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:23, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Boguszów Chapel in Mielec 1 --Jacek Halicki 08:21, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:23, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Boguszów Chapel in Mielec 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:21, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:45, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Boguszów Chapel in Mielec 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:21, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:45, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Boguszów Chapel in Mielec 3 --Jacek Halicki 08:21, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 08:34, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Boguszów Chapel in Mielec 3 --Jacek Halicki 08:21, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 08:34, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination First lodge chapel in Mielec --Jacek Halicki 08:21, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:23, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination First lodge chapel in Mielec --Jacek Halicki 08:21, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:23, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Snake-eyed Lizard (Ophisops elegans). Adana - Turkey. --Zcebeci 08:13, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality --Halavar 10:22, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Snake-eyed Lizard (Ophisops elegans). Adana - Turkey. --Zcebeci 08:13, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality --Halavar 10:22, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Wing upperside view of a False Small White (Pieris pseudorapae). Adana, Turkey. --Zcebeci 08:13, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Decline  Oppose left wing overexposed --Christian Ferrer 18:06, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Wing upperside view of a False Small White (Pieris pseudorapae). Adana, Turkey. --Zcebeci 08:13, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Decline  Oppose left wing overexposed --Christian Ferrer 18:06, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Electric multiple unit EN57AL in Opole (Oppeln), Silesia --Pudelek 08:05, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Tsungam 08:11, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Electric multiple unit EN57AL in Opole (Oppeln), Silesia --Pudelek 08:05, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Tsungam 08:11, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Duoble-decker coach Bmnopux in Opole (Oppeln), Silesia --Pudelek 08:05, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:23, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Duoble-decker coach Bmnopux in Opole (Oppeln), Silesia --Pudelek 08:05, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:23, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination SU42 locomotive and Bmnopux double-deck coach in Opole (Oppeln), Silesia --Pudelek 08:05, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:26, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination SU42 locomotive and Bmnopux double-deck coach in Opole (Oppeln), Silesia --Pudelek 08:05, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:26, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination SU42 locomotive and Bmnopux double-deck coach in Opole (Oppeln), Silesia --Pudelek 08:05, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:26, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination SU42 locomotive and Bmnopux double-deck coach in Opole (Oppeln), Silesia --Pudelek 08:05, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:26, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Milchgrotte in der Altstadt von Bethlehem, Palästina --Ralf Roletschek 07:54, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:26, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Milchgrotte in der Altstadt von Bethlehem, Palästina --Ralf Roletschek 07:54, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:26, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Altstadt von Bethlehem, Palästina --Ralf Roletschek 07:54, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Es ist zwar die Neustadt, aber wir wollen nicht so pingelig sein... --Hubertl 08:36, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Altstadt von Bethlehem, Palästina --Ralf Roletschek 07:54, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Es ist zwar die Neustadt, aber wir wollen nicht so pingelig sein... --Hubertl 08:36, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination hinter einer Tankstelle in der Altstadt von Bethlehem, Palästina --Ralf Roletschek 07:54, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:26, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination hinter einer Tankstelle in der Altstadt von Bethlehem, Palästina --Ralf Roletschek 07:54, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:26, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Altstadt von Bethlehem, Palästina --Ralf Roletschek 07:54, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:26, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Altstadt von Bethlehem, Palästina --Ralf Roletschek 07:54, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:26, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Nature reserve "Teiche am Steinheimer Holz", Steinheim, Germany. --Tsungam 07:01, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:27, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Nature reserve "Teiche am Steinheimer Holz", Steinheim, Germany. --Tsungam 07:01, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:27, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Cathedral (Parma) - Assumption by Correggio --Livioandronico2013 06:44, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 07:44, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Cathedral (Parma) - Assumption by Correggio --Livioandronico2013 06:44, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 07:44, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Statue of St.Peter in St. Nicholas and Gumbertus in Stublang --Ermell 06:22, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:30, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Statue of St.Peter in St. Nicholas and Gumbertus in Stublang --Ermell 06:22, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:30, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Statue of Mary St.Mary in St. Nicholas and Gumbertus in Stublang --Ermell 06:22, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:30, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Statue of Mary St.Mary in St. Nicholas and Gumbertus in Stublang --Ermell 06:22, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:30, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Side altar of St. Nicholas and Gumbertus in Stublang --Ermell 06:22, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:30, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Side altar of St. Nicholas and Gumbertus in Stublang --Ermell 06:22, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:30, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Organ loft of St. Nicholas and Gumbertus in Stublang --Ermell 06:22, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:56, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Organ loft of St. Nicholas and Gumbertus in Stublang --Ermell 06:22, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:56, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Germany, Schloss Bebenhausen, view from northeast --Berthold Werner 06:20, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:53, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Germany, Schloss Bebenhausen, view from northeast --Berthold Werner 06:20, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:53, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Nature of It Fryske Gea in the Netherlands. Around the heath. --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:37, 28 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 05:50, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Nature of It Fryske Gea in the Netherlands. Around the heath.
      --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:37, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 05:50, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Azanuy, Huesca, Spain --Poco a poco 18:37, 27 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Bit above the air cut maybe some better, but good quality.--Famberhorst 15:48, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Azanuy, Huesca, Spain --Poco a poco 18:37, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Bit above the air cut maybe some better, but good quality.--Famberhorst 15:48, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination La Portella, Lleida, Spain --Poco a poco 18:37, 27 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion OK. --A.Savin 20:02, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination La Portella, Lleida, Spain --Poco a poco 18:37, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion OK. --A.Savin 20:02, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Statue in St. Nicholas and Gumbertus in Stublang --Ermell 13:55, 27 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Could you sharpen it a bit, please? --ElBute 18:04, 27 April 2016 (UTC) Done Thanks for reviewing.--Ermell 22:09, 27 April 2016 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --ElBute 11:41, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Statue in St. Nicholas and Gumbertus in Stublang --Ermell 13:55, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Could you sharpen it a bit, please? --ElBute 18:04, 27 April 2016 (UTC)✓ Done
      Thanks for reviewing.--Ermell 22:09, 27 April 2016 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --ElBute 11:41, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination The views from the tourist route E4: Parz Lich - Goshavank monastery. Dilijan National Park, Tavush Province, Armenia. --Halavar 09:18, 27 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Also noise, but barely OK for me --A.Savin 19:59, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination The views from the tourist route E4: Parz Lich - Goshavank monastery. Dilijan National Park, Tavush Province, Armenia. --Halavar 09:18, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Also noise, but barely OK for me --A.Savin 19:59, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Mkhitar Gosh funeral chapel. Dilijan National Park, Gosh, Tavush Province, Armenia. --Halavar 09:18, 27 April 2016 (UTC) * Decline  Oppose Very noisy at shadows, e.g. left lower area. Any reason for IDO-400 at day time? Also, probably excessive lightening (I have sometimes similar problem); but again, it is hard to understand for me why so much of lightening, when there is enough light anyways. --A.Savin 19:57, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Mkhitar Gosh funeral chapel. Dilijan National Park, Gosh, Tavush Province, Armenia. --Halavar 09:18, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Decline  Oppose Very noisy at shadows, e.g. left lower area. Any reason for IDO-400 at day time? Also, probably excessive lightening (I have sometimes similar problem); but again, it is hard to understand for me why so much of lightening, when there is enough light anyways. --A.Savin 19:57, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Dar Errachida Medina of Tunis. By User:Noomen9 --Touzrimounir 09:01, 27 April 2016 (UTC) * Decline  Oppose Perspectice not done, partly overexposed, barrel distortion. --Code 09:38, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Dar Errachida Medina of Tunis. By User:Noomen9 --Touzrimounir 09:01, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Decline  Oppose Perspectice not done, partly overexposed, barrel distortion. --Code 09:38, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination The Palazzo Michiel del Brusà on the left and Palazzo Smith Mangilli Valmarana on the right from the Canal Grande in Venice. --Moroder 05:52, 27 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good composition because it gives me in one shot what I can expect from Veneto. Sharp enough for Q1. It might need a small perspective change or is it an optical illusion? --Michielverbeek 06:48, 27 April 2016 (UTC) Comment I double checked on the vertical lines. This is all I can do. All of Venice is an optical illusion ;-) Many thanks for the review --Moroder 14:04, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination The Palazzo Michiel del Brusà on the left and Palazzo Smith Mangilli Valmarana on the right from the Canal Grande in Venice. --Moroder 05:52, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good composition because it gives me in one shot what I can expect from Veneto. Sharp enough for Q1. It might need a small perspective change or is it an optical illusion? --Michielverbeek 06:48, 27 April 2016 (UTC) Comment I double checked on the vertical lines. This is all I can do. All of Venice is an optical illusion ;-) Many thanks for the review --Moroder 14:04, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Sympetrum striolatum, Common Darter dragonfly (female) --Stu's Images 21:59, 26 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Truly excellent. Possible FP? The only thing that distrubs a little is the surface the insect is sitting on, but that allows us to see the wings since they aren't moving. --Peulle 22:12, 26 April 2016 (UTC)*  Comment Thanks for the comment, I'll think about FP but I agree the about the background really --Stu's Images 21:24, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Sympetrum striolatum, Common Darter dragonfly (female) --Stu's Images 21:59, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Truly excellent. Possible FP? The only thing that distrubs a little is the surface the insect is sitting on, but that allows us to see the wings since they aren't moving. --Peulle 22:12, 26 April 2016 (UTC)*  Comment Thanks for the comment, I'll think about FP but I agree the about the background really --Stu's Images 21:24, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Julius Tandler (1869-1936), bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna --Hubertl 07:24, 25 April 2016 (UTC) * Withdrawn Withdrawn, not good enough. I tried it three times to get this as a whole - obviously impossible with a high quality standard. --Hubertl 07:47, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination: Entrance of the Botanical Garden of Santa Catalina. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 15:28, 22 April 2016 (UTC) * * Review needed
    • Nomination: Entrance of the Botanical Garden of Santa Catalina. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 15:28, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Review needed
  • * Nomination Information board in Kamieniec Ząbkowicki Abbey 2 --Jacek Halicki 07:24, 21 April 2016 (UTC) * Promotion The contrast at the left side is pretty faded. Can yopu apply gruaduated filter with minus exposure and plus contrast/dehaze? --Cccefalon 04:10, 22 April 2016 (UTC)@Cccefalon:  Done --Jacek Halicki 20:50, 22 April 2016 (UTC) Good quality. Sorry for delayed re-assessment. --Cccefalon 05:26, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Information board in Kamieniec Ząbkowicki Abbey 2 --Jacek Halicki 07:24, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion The contrast at the left side is pretty faded. Can yopu apply gruaduated filter with minus exposure and plus contrast/dehaze? --Cccefalon 04:10, 22 April 2016 (UTC)@Cccefalon: ✓ Done --Jacek Halicki 20:50, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
      Good quality. Sorry for delayed re-assessment. --Cccefalon 05:26, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination 1953 MG TD --DeFacto 20:53, 17 April 2016 (UTC) * Decline another cars in the background are distrubing Ezarate 21:11, 17 April 2016 (UTC) The white MG is to bright. -- Spurzem 18:22, 18 April 2016 (UTC) license plate --Ralf Roletschek 23:21, 26 April 2016 (UTC)  Comment It is only a courtesy to obscure the plate. As long as the car is in a public environment, there is no legal reason against publication. See also Regional Court Kassel (Ruling 10.05.2007 – Az.: 1 T 75/07) --Cccefalon 08:43, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination 1953 MG TD --DeFacto 20:53, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Decline another cars in the background are distrubing Ezarate 21:11, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
      The white MG is to bright. -- Spurzem 18:22, 18 April 2016 (UTC) license plate --Ralf Roletschek 23:21, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
       Comment It is only a courtesy to obscure the plate. As long as the car is in a public environment, there is no legal reason against publication. See also Regional Court Kassel (Ruling 10.05.2007 – Az.: 1 T 75/07) --Cccefalon 08:43, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Consensual review[edit]

File:Alfa_Romeo_MiTo_02.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Alfa Romeo MiTo in Odessa, Ukraine. By User:Maksa --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 23:13, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose The logo of Alfa Romeo and the left head light are very bright. Further I don't like such white license plates. -- Spurzem 18:17, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose white license plate no can be a QI --Ralf Roletschek 23:19, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree: It is only a courtesy to obscure the plate. As long as the car is in a public environment, there is no legal reason against publication. See also Regional Court Kassel (Ruling 10.05.2007 – Az.: 1 T 75/07) --Cccefalon 08:28, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 08:34, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

File:MG_TD_1953_-_rear.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination 1953 MG TD --DeFacto 20:53, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment IMHO, the another cars in the background are distrubing Ezarate 21:10, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
    •  Comment Further the MG TD seems to be overexposed. -- Spurzem 18:22, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose license plate --Ralf Roletschek 23:21, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment, can I have more views on how to hide number plates please. DeFacto 06:19, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment It is only a courtesy to obscure the plate. As long as the car is in a public environment, there is no legal reason against publication. See also Regional Court Kassel (Ruling 10.05.2007 – Az.: 1 T 75/07) --Cccefalon 08:43, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
    •  Comment only in german, sorry: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Ralf_Roletschek/Kennzeichen_verpixeln --Ralf Roletschek 11:25, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
      •  Comment, Cccefalon, Ralf Roletschek you misunderstand the reason I make the plates obscure - it is not because I think there is any legal reason to obscure it. There are two very good reasons to obscure the plates: 1, to protect the owner's privacy - they may not want their location at the time of the photo to be known by someone else. 2, to remove an opportunity for vehicle crime - with law enforcement agencies using number plate recognition cameras to help locate criminals, more and more criminals are using fake plates which are copied from similar vehicles to avoid detection - I do not want to provide a free and easy source of valid registration numbers for them to use. DeFacto 20:03, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 08:35, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

File:20160416 AUTHUN 2770.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Ice hockey Coach Rich Chernomaz --Ailura 14:15, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Not quite sharp enough. --Peulle 14:18, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
    •  Comment not my best picture, but i don't think sharpness is the crucial issue. --Ailura 06:30, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support lets discuss, in my eyes sharp to QI --Ralf Roletschek 20:30, 27 April 2016 (UTC) --Ralf Roletschek 20:30, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Blurred person in the foreground too dominant. Also, contrast is not good. --Cccefalon 05:32, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Bad colors and not sharp enough, especially the man in the foreground. -- Spurzem 21:24, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 19:36, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Mumbai 03-2016 14 Haji Ali Dargah.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Mumbai: Gates of Haji Ali Dargah Mosque --A.Savin 16:27, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment Good but looks tilted cw Poco a poco 20:06, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
    •  Comment For me, it is normal --A.Savin 23:48, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
      •  Comment And how do you explain that all verticals of the gate are leaning in cw direction?
      •  Comment Please sign your comments, I don't know you. Well, it may be leaning, but really very weak and it is negligible for me, especially given the fact that a further tilt would result in leaning buildings in the background. --A.Savin 20:46, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
        • Sorry, it was me, I forgot to sign. I have added a note, I believe that there is indeed a slight tilt Poco a poco 20:50, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I also think it's tilted, there's too much shadow on the gate and I personally find the buildings in the background quite distracting, they are also disturbing the clear outline of the gate. -Knöre 14:59, 25 April 2016 (UTC) * ** {{Comment}} Try to check the lines as poco says, I will support it then. --Hubertl 05:37, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support I made a second look, the construction itself is conical, therefore it is correct as it is! Pretty sophisticated! --Hubertl 05:50, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Old buildings are never straight, and if it's true that the modern buildings in background are maybe leaning about 1°, this is not enough to oppose and currently widely a QI IMO --Christian Ferrer 20:33, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support I don't think this building is tilted, it is a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 05:42, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose My eye always gets stuck on the roof in front of the gate, the right part is distracting with the other building in the back --Sven Volkens 14:36, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 19:37, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Gurudwara Bangla Sahib in New Delhi 03-2016 img4.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination New Delhi: Sikh temple, interior --A.Savin 14:49, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Borders are distorted and blurred. --Peulle 14:18, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
    • @Peulle: Could you please specify what you find wrong here? If you mean that "borders" are the areas on edges, then it is absolutely no dramatic blur, just some blur at the very top, but it is inevitable (many wide-angle QI images have similar issue!) and negligible. I also fail to see any significant distortion. --A.Savin 14:40, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
      •  Comment There are several areas in this image that are not in focus. The head and foot of the man in front, the top of the lamp, the man behind the golden drape, etc. It is especially noticable near the edges, but even if as you say that can't be helped. the image is just not sharp enough for QI, in my opinion. If others disagree, feel free to comment and take the image to discussion. Best regards, --Peulle 14:41, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
        •  Comment Can't see problems with the borders beyond the typical caused by wide angle lenses. However, there are some CA that should be fixed. Changing the status to discussion. --ElBute 18:56, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
        • The "support" vote here - was that made by you, @ElBute: ? Since there is also a "comment" tag in front of your comment, I got confused. --Peulle 09:15, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Yes, the support vote is mine. Sorry I could have messed things up. It is reorganised now. --ElBute 09:59, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done: Removed some flares on lights (≠ CA), slight perspective correction at the left. I don't think that all the people can (and should) be in focus. The photo is about the interior of the temple, which is sufficiently sharp at bigger part. Thanks --A.Savin 14:47, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support ok now for me too. --Hubertl 17:26, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support sorry for german.. - Ich wollte eigentlich Kontra stimmen, weil die beiden größten Personen mitten im Bild mit dem Rücken zur Kamera stehen. Aber je öfter ich das Bild ansehe, umso eher paßt es. Das ist zwar "technisch" nicht optimal aber irgendwie stimmt es trotzdem. Das Bild ist nichts für kurzes Hinsehen und Gut oder Schlecht finden, man muß das länger ansehen. Und je länger, umso eher stimmt es. Sorry, ich kann es nicht ausdrücken, warum - aber das stimmt einfach. Und das hat wirklich nichts mit dem Fotografen zu tun! Gut gemacht. --Ralf Roleček 20:36, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 08:36, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Owls_Head_Light_Vertical_Center.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Owls Head Light --Ram-Man 19:43, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment Please have a look at the difference between the the horiozon on the left and right side. --Milseburg 12:34, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment Image is tilted. --Peulle 14:33, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment Tilt is fixable. Usually, such images will be given a week's time. --Milseburg 16:31, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment Very well. Standing by... --Peulle 21:48, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Week is over. Still tilted. --Milseburg 15:43, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done Ram-Man 01:34, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Ok for me now. --Hubertl 05:40, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Agreed. Image is good enough for QI.--Peulle 10:26, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unfortunately tilted --Michielverbeek 05:38, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support --Palauenc05 05:56, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 08:37, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Monaco-Rolls-Royce-4071034PS.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Rolls Royce Ghost --Ermell 12:52, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment Fairly good quality, albeit some blur on the car's left side. --Peulle 14:34, 23 April 2016 (UTC) ** @Peulle:
    Could you please mark the part for better understanding--Ermell 09:17, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
      •  Comment Mirror. Also not sure about the perspective; let's move to consensual review. --Peulle 21:48, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
        •  Comment Sorry, I don´t understand what you mean with your complaints, Peulle. --Hubertl 05:41, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
        •  Comment Sorry, I'll try to be more clear: The car is in focus (except for a small area on the left side-mirror), and I think probably QI. A thing that makes me unsure is whether this perspective of the car (you don't see the whole car, just the front) makes it good enough for a QI nomination. That's why I moved it to consensual review, so that other people could weigh in. So far, though, nobody have. Hmm.--Peulle 10:34, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support I do. --Hubertl 17:25, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose manipulated license plate and too strong wide-angle. --Ralf Roletschek 20:38, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Background messy. Use of wide angle lens without sense. -- Smial 10:04, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 19:38, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Marine_Drive_Cherry_Blossoms_02.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Cherry Blossoms at Marine Drive Residence, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada --Xicotencatl 09:25, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Decent composition, but lacks focus on quite a lot of the image (right side). --Peulle 14:34, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Fine 4 me. --Palauenc05 20:04, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support as Palauenc. --Hubertl 05:42, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Quality high enough for a Q1photo  Support --Michielverbeek 05:33, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 08:39, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Rimberg (Knuell).JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Rimberg in the Knüll Mountains --Milseburg 10:56, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality; not quite sharp enough. --Peulle 12:51, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
    •  Comment I think, light, colors and composition are good. I can´t see, that this image is less sharp than most other promoted QI of landscapes, be they mine or those of other photographers. More opinions Further opinions welcome.--Milseburg 16:46, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  weak It´s not your usual sharpness you present, but enough for QI. --Hubertl 13:26, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Also a  Support with same arguments as Hubertl --Michielverbeek 05:31, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 08:40, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

File:2014_Prowincja_Tawusz,_Widok_z_klasztoru_Hagarcin_(01).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination View from Haghartsin Monastery. Dilijan National Park, Tavush Province, Armenia. --Halavar 16:22, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Too much noise. --Peulle 16:55, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support for me it´s ok. --Hubertl 02:48, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too unsharp --Michielverbeek 07:07, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Hubertl. --Milseburg 17:30, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The sky is too pale & noisy. You should fiddle around with the gradiation curves & depress the brightness of the blue channel a bit. --Jacek79 17:12, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough. --Palauenc05 15:02, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 20:40, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 08:40, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

File:643 044 RB51 Glanerbrug.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Bombardier TALENT of DB Regio NRW on a cross-border service in Glanerbrug, Netherlands. --Jacek79 13:47, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment burnt sky? --Ezarate 14:38, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Peulle 15:16, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree: Obviously, parts of the sky are blown out. Please pay attention to the histogram. It is also bad behaviour in QIC to just override the concerns of the primary reviewer. --Cccefalon 20:25, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment OK, shall I retry with the gradiation curves? --Jacek79 15:46, 24 April 2016 (UTC) Done.
  •  Support -- Spurzem 19:56, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose the sky is still blown out Ezarate 12:55, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 20:40, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 08:41, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Quality_images_candidates/Archives_May_01_2016&oldid=524678194"