Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 28 2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Angel_head_on_painting_of_Saint_Antony_San_Antone_church_Urtijëi.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Angel head on painting of life of Saint Antony of Padua in the Antony church in Urtijëi. --Moroder 18:26, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Had to think about this for a moment. It seems fine, but I think the composition is a problem. If the head is the subject, why leave in parts of the frame and not zoom in further? If the whole thing is the subject, why crop out so much of the painting? As it stands, I just think that bottom crop spoils it. You can't just fix it with a crop either, because of the angle and the width of the frame. Feel free to discuss if you'd like more opinions.--Peulle 08:24, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for the review. The wings are part of the angel. I didn't want to have too much empty space on the top and wanted the head centered --Moroder 12:04, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support - I think the composition is OK. -- Ikan Kekek 07:19, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose as Peulle. --Smial 16:35, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose That will imho never do! Random composition with ugly shadows. Man fotografiert keinen Hals von unten, gerade Engel nicht. Das macht sie fett und unansehnlich. Engel haben Babyspeck, sie sind "zwackig", aber doch nicht so, bitte. Zwei mal 45° Kunstlichter machen die Sache noch unvorteilhafter, Blitz hätte vllt. geholfen. Ich verstehe den Diskurs alleine mit dem anderen Bild nicht, ist auch kein Repro imo aber wesentlich besser--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 19:20, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support it would have likely been better with the subject not shadowed, but the result is not so disturbing, a good quality image of this angel head. --Christian Ferrer 20:23, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 18:52, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Spruce trees, tors and caribou antlers at Wolf Creek campsite, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Spruce trees, tors and caribou antlers, seen from the groover at a campsite in Canada's Ivvavik National Park --Daniel Case 19:32, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. F/16 is a lot. IMO f/11 would be enough. --XRay 19:57, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment Less visible than in the other images but here are dust spots, too. --Basotxerri 21:07, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
  • Yes but please check again, there are some left. --Basotxerri 16:34, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
  • {{o}} And oversaturated: Colors, especially blue, are unnatural. Overprocessed IMO--Lmbuga 03:23, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
  •  Neutral Sorry, I'm not sure--Lmbuga 12:11, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment - I see a whole bunch of little dust spots now on the left side of the sky. Have another look. -- Ikan Kekek 01:44, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
I took care of as many of them as I could find. Daniel Case 03:25, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
You got most of them. I'm also seeing what looks to me like posterization of dark blue. -- Ikan Kekek 07:25, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
Took care of that, too. Daniel Case 16:06, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support - Much better. -- Ikan Kekek 08:20, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 21:13, 27 March 2018 (UTC)