Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 28 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Close_wing_position_of_Graphium_antiphates,_Cramer,_1775_–_Five-bar_Swordtail_WLB.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination [edit][edit] Close wing position of Graphium antiphates, Cramer, 1775 – Five-bar Swordtail WLB. By User:Sayan911 --Bodhisattwa 10:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality -- Spurzem 11:04, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Overprocessed. Far from QI --A.Savin 12:34, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose No, no, that isn't. --Basotxerri 09:02, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per others.--Peulle 13:04, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 12:11, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Close_wing_position_of_Papilio_paris,_Linnaeus,_1758_–_Paris_Peacock_WLB.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination [edit][edit] Close wing position of Papilio paris, Linnaeus, 1758 – Paris Peacock WLB. By User:Sayan911 --Bodhisattwa 10:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality -- Spurzem 11:04, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unsharp and overprocessed. --A.Savin 12:33, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose ... and that isn't either... --Basotxerri 09:03, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per A.Savin --Sandro Halank 09:13, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per others.--Peulle 13:05, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 12:12, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Sanchi_Stupa_'TORANAS'_The_Entry_Gate4.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination This is a photo of ASI monument number --Suyash.dwivedi 16:14, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:58, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry but there are chromatic aberrations. --A.Savin 15:18, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support The CAs are negligible for me. -- Spurzem 11:29, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose negligible?? Strong CA. --Carschten 12:00, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
    Negligible for Spurzem are my reviews, that's for sure and meanwhile a well-known old hut. --A.Savin 12:31, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
@A.Savin: I don't like such imputations. -- Spurzem 12:57, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
de:WP:RTL. --A.Savin 13:38, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose strong CAs, not a QI to me. --Sandro Halank 09:07, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I've seen worse, but since CA are so easy to fix, I'll vote oppose until it's done.--Peulle 13:08, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 19:31, 27 March 2017 (UTC)