Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 27 2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Swayne's_hartebeest_(Alcelaphus_buselaphus_swaynei).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Swayne's hartebeest (Alcelaphus buselaphus swaynei) --Charlesjsharp 16:03, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Too blurry, not a QI, sorry --Poco a poco 18:42, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support. Perhaps no FP but QI as I think. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 19:45, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Indeed to blurry --Uoaei1 22:29, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek 00:41, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose +1. --Peulle 10:05, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Milseburg 20:36, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Open_wing_posture_Basking_of_Charaxes_solon_(Fabricius,_1793)_–_Black_Rajah_WLB_DSC_7142.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Open wing posture Basking of Charaxes solon (Fabricius, 1793) – Black Rajah (by Sandipoutsider) --Atudu 06:24, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:41, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose strong CA, artifacts --Carschten 16:24, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Carschten. -- Ikan Kekek 09:07, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose +1 --Peulle 13:51, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Milseburg 20:35, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Ilhéu_do_Gorgulho_-_Funchal.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Ilhéu do Gorgulho, Funchal, Madeira --Llez 06:18, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:53, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Something is wrong here. Especially the sky looks very blotchy. --Milseburg 07:21, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done You are right, I made the corrections --Llez 06:22, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Well done. --Milseburg 07:31, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg 20:34, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Poličany,_klášter_trapistek-2019_(3).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Our Lady upon Vltava Trappist Monastery in village Poličany, Benešov District, Central Bohemian Region, Czechia --T.Bednarz 13:53, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality -- Spurzem 19:19, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I'm sorry, but I see strong CA on the cross. --Draceane 22:13, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment - I see it, too. -- Ikan Kekek 09:37, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done @Ikan Kekek, Draceane, and T.Bednarz: CA reduced. --Carschten 12:44, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support - Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 00:47, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Thanks to Carschten. Now it's OK. --Draceane 08:06, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg 20:33, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Castle_of_Belcastel_62.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Castle of Belcastel, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 07:44, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:08, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose tilted, or is the whole structure tilted --Charlesjsharp 12:33, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
  • For me all is ok. This is medieval tower, so partially is not straight in reality. --Tournasol7 22:48, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support per Tournasol7's explanation. There's a darker blue blotch above the tower, though, and I'm not sure whether that might be a dust spot of some kind or not, so I merely bring it up for your consideration. -- Ikan Kekek 09:38, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support --Carschten 15:50, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg 20:31, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Female_Toque_macaque_with_her_child_at_Katagamuwa_Sanctuary_-_(Don't_let_them_fade_away).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Macaca sinica. By User:Senthiaathavan --Andrew J.Kurbiko 11:43, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 12:04, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
     Comment Looks as if the blue sky has been added in post-processing --Charlesjsharp 14:08, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Overprocessed (artificial DOF blur) --Smial 11:08, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Strange blur. Draceane 22:19, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined XRay 05:40, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Open wing posture Nectaring of Cethosia cyane (Drury, (1773)) – Leopard Lacewing (Female) WLB-NEI DSC 4514 on Zinnia elegans.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination: Open wing posture Nectaring of Cethosia cyane (Drury, [1773]) – Leopard Lacewing (Female) (by Rahulbiswas29) --Atudu 12:08, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Review
     Support Just ok --Poco a poco 18:51, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
     Comment I'd welcomme a third opinion on noise. and why no EXIF? Downsized? --Charlesjsharp 09:25, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
     Oppose strong colour noise --Carschten 18:11, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support. -- Spurzem 12:42, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Carschten --Smial 15:48, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days XRay 05:40, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Open_wing_Basking_posture_of_Graphium_agamemnon_(Linnaeus,_1758)_–_Tailed_Jay_(Male)_WLB-NEI_DSC_4982.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Open wing Basking posture of Graphium agamemnon (Linnaeus, 1758) – Tailed Jay (Male) (by Rahulbiswas29) --Atudu 12:06, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:42, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
     Comment why no EXIF? Downsized? --Charlesjsharp 09:25, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good for me. In my opinion an image is not bad because of missing EXIF. -- Spurzem 12:44, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted XRay 05:39, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Close_wing_Nectaring_posture_of_Cethosia_cyane_(Drury,_(1773))_–_Leopard_Lacewing_(Female)_WLB-NEI_DSC_4520.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Close wing Nectaring posture of Cethosia cyane (Drury, [1773]) – Leopard Lacewing (Female) (by Rahulbiswas29) --Atudu 12:00, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:42, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
     Comment why no EXIF? Downsized? --Charlesjsharp 09:25, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Beautiful and good quality -- Spurzem 12:45, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted XRay 05:38, 26 March 2020 (UTC)