Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 25 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Statue_of_Heracles_in_Palazzo_Massimo_alle_Terme_(Rome).JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Statue of Heracles in Palazzo Massimo alle Terme (Rome) --Livioandronico2013 08:52, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Unfortunately the head is out of focus, sorry --Moroder 19:08, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ Done Better? Thanks. --Livioandronico2013 21:37, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support I think it is good now. QI -- Spurzem 21:11, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Spurzem --Palauenc05 21:11, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good Now --Ercé 10:34, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:28, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Livioandronico2013 20:18, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

File:St Casimir Church Interior 1, Vilnius, Lithuania - Diliff.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination: St. Casimir Church main altar. Vilnius, Lithuania. (by Diliff) --Pofka 08:46, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Support Good quality--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:36, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Is it really QI? Please look at the rear vaults and at the chandeliers. They are very distorted. And the dome is too bright. -- Spurzem 23:04, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Its always bright inside of this church. The details quality is unquestionable for me. Just look at the altar and all the frescoes. -- Pofka (talk) 11:39, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
Of course the image is very sharp but please look at the marks. -- Spurzem 13:57, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. Yann 20:17, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Spurzem,distortion is too obvious --Livioandronico2013 19:43, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment I agree with Spurzem about the distortion (the bright window does not bother me). Added a crop suggestion (might be considered a violent one) to avoid that extreme wide-angle view. Diliff’s images show an excellent level of detail and don’t need these extreme wide angles to offer lots of "wow" IMHO. --Kreuzschnabel 19:51, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Livioandronico2013 20:31, 24 March 2015 (UTC)