Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 24 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Sparrhorn_Panorama_Labeled.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination: Labeled 360° panorama from Sparrhorn (Naters, Valais, Switzerland) --Capricorn4049 20:03, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Support Remarkable work. I think Füllhorn is missing a L ? --Ermell 21:44, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
    •  Comment Thank you for your precise review. I admit that the name is a bit strange, but the mountain is actually called Fülhorn (see [here]) --Capricorn4049 23:28, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The informative caption makes it valuable. But I recommend having such pictures appraised before attaching the labels, so that any deficiencies are addressed in good time. Stitch problems are not always sufficiently resolved, e.g. in the area of the Rothorn, 2888 m (Corno die Cramac, Pizzo Quadro are missing) or between Wasenhorn and Breithorn. The alignment deviates noticeably from reality, e.g. Ofenhorn 3235 m and Hübschorn should appear at the same elevation angle. In addition, turquoise color gradients in the sky are annoying. The caption seems exaggerated to me. Sometimes the text is too narrow. Text fields should better be transparent. --Milseburg 11:45, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
    •  Comment Thank you for the review. I am speechless and full of admiration how you found the stitching errors (and my retouching attempts of them). Chapeau --Capricorn4049 00:36, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Augustgeyler 22:23, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

File:Copa_de_luces_-_A742849.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Cup of lights. --Rjcastillo 06:52, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose The cup is tilted. The background also feels tilted due to the cup being on a slope. And the background is a bit distractive. -- 22:58, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thanks, but I disagree, the terrain is sloping. --Rjcastillo 00:17, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Considering the mast behind the subject, it is the right angle. --LexKurochkin 06:25, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per 痛. --GRDN711 18:36, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I can't get past the mast seeming to grow out of the cup. -- Ikan Kekek 19:19, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
  • Fixed thanks for reviews. --Rjcastillo 00:12, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
    •  Strong oppose And where is the mast with antenna? The image should be marked as "Retouched" and its encyclopedic value is undermined IMO. --LexKurochkin 09:20, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
  • Anyway, the tree is still growing out of the cup. -- Ikan Kekek 23:27, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 22:22, 23 March 2023 (UTC)