Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 22 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:St._Alexis_Cathedral,_Samarkand_01.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination St. Alexis Cathedral, Samarkand, Uzbekistan --Bgag 03:05, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:30, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose tight crop at top --Charlesjsharp 20:11, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
  •  Weak support Crop may be tight but IMO not too tight, there's nothing cut off and there's still a stripe of blue sky above the cross. I am more bothered by the lack of overall sharpness, but it's still ok. --Plozessor 05:44, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:59, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

File:Kruger_National_Park_(ZA),_Giraffe_--_2024_--_0064.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Giraffe, Kruger National Park, Mpumalanga, South Africa --XRay 02:14, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:07, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose too much obscured --Charlesjsharp 20:19, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Then let's call it "Giraffe behind a tree" ;) Picture is good. --Plozessor 05:41, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good Quality, he got Battle scars too. --IM3847 09:17, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:56, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

File:Kruger_National_Park_(ZA),_Meerkatze_--_2024_--_0068.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Vervet monkey on a tree, Kruger National Park, Mpumalanga, South Africa --XRay 02:14, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:40, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose blurred and we cannot see the head --Charlesjsharp 20:20, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose Per Charlesjsharp, seems not focused on the animal. --Plozessor 05:40, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Yes, not sharp enough --Jakubhal 20:03, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:57, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

File:Tribu_Laarim,_Kimotong,_Sudán_del_Sur,_2024-01-24,_DD_109.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Laarim Tribe, Kimotong, South Sudan --Poco a poco 20:05, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 20:17, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
 Oppose It looks quite noisy to me, which leads to odd edge effects, see the shoulders for example. --Mike Peel 08:01, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
True, something went wrong here. ✓ New version Poco a poco 23:47, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
The new version looks much better, but still noise issues, e.g., on the arm on the right of the photo, and the belly. Thanks. Mike Peel 09:31, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but it has very strange effects (varying noise patters and halos) around the shoulders, the hair and elsewhere. Maybe it was (poorly) processed by AI? Clearly not a QI IMO, and I don't think that the current version can be edited to fix it. Maybe start a new raw conversion from scratch. --Plozessor 06:01, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
  • @Mike Peel and Plozessor: there is a new version...Poco a poco 12:28, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Better now, but at full resolution it seems to suffer from motion blur, at 2.5 MB it looks ok though. I still don't support it, but it's good enough to remove my opposing vote. Let's see what others say. --Plozessor 13:23, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support It's good for me now, thanks for iterating on this. Thanks. Mike Peel 14:18, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 23:01, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

File:Lucha_entre_clanes_de_la_tribu_Mundari,_Terekeka,_Sudán_del_Sur,_2024-01-29,_DD_112.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Wrestling of different clans of the Mundari tribe, Terekeka, South Sudan --Poco a poco 20:05, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Sorry, but nothing is really sharp. --Alexander-93 20:17, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Please, let's discuss, I've uploaded a new version which deserves the stamp IMHO --Poco a poco 23:28, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support New version is ok. Hair is a bit blurry but it's not noticeable in downscaled versions. --Plozessor 05:58, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support new version, which looks better than the original one. Thanks. Mike Peel 09:35, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Jakubhal 13:11, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 23:02, 21 March 2024 (UTC)