Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 21 2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Kavant_Fair_256.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Rathwa tribe during Kavant fair.--Vijay Barot 16:54, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:38, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It seems like the description contains copyrighted text. Please explain that or fix it --Podzemnik 01:30, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done Description of the photographs is simplified now. And thanks to pointed out this. I will keep in mind in future.--Vijay Barot 16:32, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
      •  Comment Was the description fixed only in English? The Gujarati text still seems rather long. I do not read or speak that language, but would definitely ask for both language versions to be fixed. --Kritzolina 10:38, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
        •  Comment I respect your views and understand your doubt about the Gujarati text but trust me its my own narration about the Kavant fair and what the image depicts. here I described the fair and about the photographed tribe. (eg. What he wear and painted on his body.) But for your satisfaction I will simplified it. ( Modified version of Gujarati text is :"A Rathwa tribe during Kavant fair". Hope you are ok with this.--Vijay Barot 14:58, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
  • This would be a tribesman, not the whole tribe. -- Ikan Kekek 18:53, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thanks and sorry for being so critical! --Kritzolina 21:45, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support - I edited your English description. Cool photo! -- Ikan Kekek 18:55, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support --Kritzolina 21:45, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 23:08, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

File:3671_Ethiopie_ethnie_Nyangatom.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Ethiopie, jeune fille nyangatomI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:. By User:Yves Picq --Basile Morin 04:54, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:40, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose inappropriate, would this be OK if the girl was white? --Charlesjsharp 12:10, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
    • my point Basile is that there is no way anyone would submit a topless photo of a pubescent white girl. So why do so with a girl of colour? Charlesjsharp 09:29, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
  • I think she could be 20. How would anyone except perhaps M. Picq know? -- Ikan Kekek 09:49, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Not only she seems to be mother (with her child visible on the picture), but also modesty is a cultural notion. Nudity (Wikipedia): "In sub-Saharan Africa, full nudity or nudity below the waist is the norm among some ethnic and family groups". This similar image arrived 5th at the Picture of the year. I don't think this one will become FP, but please read above, the section "Evaluating images": "the reviewer should consider the same guidelines as the nominator". -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:27, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
 Comment I don't think she is over 15 years old and a mother. The child may be her brother and her own mother is currently hairdressing her. Another culture. If it doesn't cause offend there, we shouldn't get upset either. I don´t know. So I don't dare to judge The quality is good. --Milseburg 16:16, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Nice image, good quality -- Spurzem 22:05, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
  • @Charlesjsharp: If you have doubts about the legality of the image, you should start a DR. --MB-one 19:53, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Basile Morin 03:20, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Open_wing_nectaring_of_Ixias_pyrene_(Linnaeus,_1764)_–_Yellow_Orange-tip_(Female)_WLB-NEI_DSC_4310.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Open wing nectaring of Ixias pyrene (Linnaeus, 1764) – Yellow Orange-tip (Female) (by Rahulbiswas29) --Atudu 08:35, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Ercé 09:00, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose over-processed (looks like highlights reduced too much) --Charlesjsharp 09:29, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose over-processed, possibly by reducing highlights too much --Charlesjsharp 09:31, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   - Seven Pandas 23:05, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Close_wing_nectaring_of_Ixias_pyrene_(Linnaeus,_1764)_–_Yellow_Orange-tip_(Female)WLB-NEI_DSC_4318.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Close wing nectaring of Ixias pyrene (Linnaeus, 1764) – Yellow Orange-tip (Female)(by Rahulbiswas29) --Atudu 08:26, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Ercé 09:00, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose over-processed, colours artifical --Charlesjsharp 09:30, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days XRay 20:15, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Crete,_Malia_beach_2019_g,_with_lifeguard_tower.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Life guard tower at Malia Beach in Crete. --Cayambe 20:20, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. Excellent please add geolocation --Wilfredor 21:56, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Nice scene but to my eye it looks like it needs to be rotated two or three degrees clockwise. --Bobulous 21:57, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Requesting discussion of need for rotation. --Bobulous 18:10, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose for now. It is quite hard to tell what is upright in such a motif, but the big antenna/mast at the right horizon confirms that we need some rotation. @Cayambe: Could you try to rotate this (nice!) photo a bit, and/or to apply some perspective correction? In addition, geolocation would be nice. --Aristeas 10:06, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It's difficult to see, since the wooden structure itself might be leaning, but judging from the mobile mast in the right rear, I'd agree that the image appears a little bit tilted.--Peulle 10:08, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Sorry for being late. I had fixed the verticals on the panels on the tower. Tomorrow, Monday, I'll try out some rotation/perspective correction based on the antenna at the far right. --Cayambe 16:05, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Verticals at the right side are now fixed, see the big antenna in the far right. The wooden box fixed to the right side of the tower is leaning to the left as is the right support of the tower... in consequence the infopanel supported by the signpost is 'naturally' leaning to the left. Please also have a look at the (very faint) masts in the far distance at left. I really think that this now 'correctly' displays the verticals. Geotag added. Regards, --Cayambe 17:41, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support The horizon is OK now. --T.Bednarz 12:32, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support ditto. Thank you very much for the continued work on this image ;–). --Aristeas 09:08, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted XRay 20:13, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

File:P-8_hardpoint,_ILA_2018,_Schönefeld_(1X7A5416)_(cropped).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination hardpoint of a Boeing P-8 Poseidon, ILA 2018 --MB-one 10:02, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality. Please need cut this picture to center in the main subject, severals elements distracting --Wilfredor 21:54, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment New crop. Thanks for the review. --MB-one 12:38, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. much better --Wilfredor 22:04, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Basile Morin 03:22, 20 March 2020 (UTC)