Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 19 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Snowy_winter_landscape,_Jammu_and_Kashmir,_India.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Snowy winter landscape near the Verinag town in southern Kashmir Valley, Jammu and Kashmir, India. --UnpetitproleX 19:18, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Lacks quality. Sorry. --Ermell 20:56, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for the review, no need to apologize. Moving for more inputs.--UnpetitproleX 10:48, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Agree with Ermell, the picture is washed out, blurry and has color grading. I don't understand why though because it was made with a proper camera at low ISO. Maybe it was saved with low JPG quality level during processing. It might be possible to achieve a way better result with better raw conversion. --Plozessor 05:55, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Agree with the above, sorry. I think the focus is right at the bottom of the photo, but needed to be on the trees in the centre for the photo to have worked out. Thanks. Mike Peel 09:37, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Yes, I was focusing on the trail. --UnpetitproleX 21:39, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 11:27, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

File:Multiplex Mara, AERO 2018, Friedrichshafen (1X7A4862).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Multiplex Mara UAV at Aero Friedrichshafen 2018 --MB-one 08:33, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 19:56, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Distracting background and overall dull tones - possibly under exposed. --GRDN711 01:49, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose Sorry, but somehow the composition does not seem aesthetic. --Plozessor 05:52, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
  •  Question @GRDN711 and Plozessor: I can't reasonably change the background, but I can alter the crop and certainly improve the exposure. Would that help? --MB-one (talk) 09:43, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
With adjusted crop and better contrast, it might be acceptable. --Plozessor 13:19, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment sorry - if there was a fix I would suggest it. Not all images are QI and IMHO, this is the case here. --GRDN711 15:03, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 11:26, 18 March 2024 (UTC)