Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 17 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • * Nomination Building of Department of Neurology at Kłodzko Hospital --Jacek Halicki 00:03, 15 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:22, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Building of Department of Neurology at Kłodzko Hospital --Jacek Halicki 00:03, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:22, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Kaleido Universidade de Vigo RC - UBU Colina Clinic --Harpagornis 22:58, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion What a wonderful mess and display of strenght! Good quality. --W.carter 23:37, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Kaleido Universidade de Vigo RC - UBU Colina Clinic --Harpagornis 22:58, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion What a wonderful mess and display of strenght! Good quality. --W.carter 23:37, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Portrait of Henry VIII of England (Holbein) --Livioandronico2013 22:13, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Portrait of Henry VIII of England (Holbein) --Livioandronico2013 22:13, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Ship engine and equipment from Waterworks Netherlands BV. --Famberhorst 19:06, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:14, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Ship engine and equipment from Waterworks Netherlands BV.
      --Famberhorst 19:06, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:14, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Hook for transporting the temporary foundation of the pipe bridge bridge over road Woudfennen in Joure for transport of sand for the construction of the new node Joure. --Famberhorst 19:06, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:13, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Hook for transporting the temporary foundation of the pipe bridge bridge over road Woudfennen in Joure for transport of sand for the construction of the new node Joure.
      --Famberhorst 19:06, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:13, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Bas-relief in Palace of Darius I, Persepolis, Iran --Poco a poco 18:25, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:26, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Bas-relief in Palace of Darius I, Persepolis, Iran --Poco a poco 18:25, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:26, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Naghsh-e rostam, Iran --Poco a poco 18:25, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:08, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Naghsh-e rostam, Iran --Poco a poco 18:25, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:08, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Beech grown under a rock in the Entzia mountain range. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 16:54, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:08, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Beech grown under a rock in the Entzia mountain range. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 16:54, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:08, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Stream bed in the Entzia mountain range. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 16:54, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 17:02, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Stream bed in the Entzia mountain range. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 16:54, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 17:02, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Church of Ziordia, the town hall on the left. Navarra, Spain --Basotxerri 16:54, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 21:41, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Church of Ziordia, the town hall on the left. Navarra, Spain --Basotxerri 16:54, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 21:41, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination View of the Biblioteca Marciana and the Palazzo Ducale on the Piazzetta San Marco square and the Campanile di San Marco in Venice --Moroder 15:45, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Great photo to my eyes and good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:26, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination View of the Biblioteca Marciana and the Palazzo Ducale on the Piazzetta San Marco square and the Campanile di San Marco in Venice --Moroder 15:45, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Great photo to my eyes and good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:26, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Day Without a Woman in Santa Fe 2017 - "Nosotras Paramos - 8M". By User:TitiNicola --Ezarate 14:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion  Comment Definitely needs a personality rights warning.--Peulle 16:44, 14 March 2017 (UTC)  Done --Ezarate 18:08, 14 March 2017 (UTC) Support--Peulle 20:22, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Day Without a Woman in Santa Fe 2017 - "Nosotras Paramos - 8M". By User:TitiNicola --Ezarate 14:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Comment Definitely needs a personality rights warning.--Peulle 16:44, 14 March 2017 (UTC) ✓ Done --Ezarate 18:08, 14 March 2017 (UTC) Support--Peulle 20:22, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Protestant church ("Kreuzkirche") in Nieheim, Germany. --Tsungam 14:15, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --C messier 12:03, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Protestant church ("Kreuzkirche") in Nieheim, Germany. --Tsungam 14:15, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality. --C messier 12:03, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Roman bust of Hermes (Musée Saint-Raymond, Toulouse) --Ruthven 14:00, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Decline Sorry, too unsharp, not QI for me. --Basotxerri 17:11, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Roman bust of Hermes (Musée Saint-Raymond, Toulouse) --Ruthven 14:00, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Decline Sorry, too unsharp, not QI for me. --Basotxerri 17:11, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Roman oil lamp (Musée Saint-Raymond, Toulouse) --Ruthven 14:00, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Decline  Oppose Apart from the distracting reflection, the oil lamp isn't sharp enough and the DOF is too shallow. IMHO, it would be better if you used a wide lens and pust the camera against the glass, to avoid the reflections and get extra stability. --C messier 11:53, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Roman oil lamp (Musée Saint-Raymond, Toulouse) --Ruthven 14:00, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Decline  Oppose Apart from the distracting reflection, the oil lamp isn't sharp enough and the DOF is too shallow. IMHO, it would be better if you used a wide lens and pust the camera against the glass, to avoid the reflections and get extra stability. --C messier 11:53, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Roman Hermes bust (Musée Saint-Raymond, Toulouse) --Ruthven 14:00, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Decline Unfortunately insufficient DOF and imo disturbing composition (reflexes). BTW it seems tilted. Sorry --Moroder 15:15, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Roman Hermes bust (Musée Saint-Raymond, Toulouse) --Ruthven 14:00, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Decline Unfortunately insufficient DOF and imo disturbing composition (reflexes). BTW it seems tilted. Sorry --Moroder 15:15, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Haraki rock, view from SE, Crete. --C messier 11:44, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Ruthven 14:03, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Haraki rock, view from SE, Crete. --C messier 11:44, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Ruthven 14:03, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Charakas castle staircase, Crete. --C messier 11:44, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 17:01, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Charakas castle staircase, Crete. --C messier 11:44, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 17:01, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Charakas castle, Crete. --C messier 11:44, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Nice photo --Ruthven 14:03, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Charakas castle, Crete. --C messier 11:44, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Nice photo --Ruthven 14:03, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Charaki rock with Charakas castle, on top Crete.--C messier 11:44, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Charaki rock with Charakas castle, on top Crete.--C messier 11:44, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Limassol: Olympic Residence towers The left corner is in fact not straight --A.Savin 13:23, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Limassol: Olympic Residence towers The left corner is in fact not straight --A.Savin 13:23, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Limassol: Kebir Great Mosque --A.Savin 13:23, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Limassol: Kebir Great Mosque --A.Savin 13:23, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Limassol: a beheaded human skeleton exposed in the city castle --A.Savin 13:23, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Limassol: a beheaded human skeleton exposed in the city castle --A.Savin 13:23, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Limassol: Marina at the Old harbour --A.Savin 13:23, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Limassol: Marina at the Old harbour --A.Savin 13:23, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination The Ponte della Paglia in Venice at sunset. --Moroder 12:16, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Lovely composition. Sharpness could be better and you might want to see whether you can sharpen a bit without damaging the work, but you have my support. -- Ikan Kekek 13:20, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination The Ponte della Paglia in Venice at sunset. --Moroder 12:16, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Lovely composition. Sharpness could be better and you might want to see whether you can sharpen a bit without damaging the work, but you have my support. -- Ikan Kekek 13:20, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Kaleido Universidade de Vigo RC - UBU Colina Clinic, 12 March 2017 División de Honor B - Grupo A --Harpagornis 10:51, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 12:44, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Kaleido Universidade de Vigo RC - UBU Colina Clinic, 12 March 2017 División de Honor B - Grupo A --Harpagornis 10:51, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 12:44, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Kaleido Universidade de Vigo RC - UBU Colina Clinic, 12 March 2017 División de Honor B - Grupo A --Harpagornis 10:51, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion A good capture of someone about to be captured. Central player is acceptably sharp in such an action photo and well centered in the melee. Good quality. --W.carter 17:11, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Kaleido Universidade de Vigo RC - UBU Colina Clinic, 12 March 2017 División de Honor B - Grupo A --Harpagornis 10:51, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion A good capture of someone about to be captured. Central player is acceptably sharp in such an action photo and well centered in the melee. Good quality. --W.carter 17:11, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Tlatelolco, Plaza de las tres Culturas in Mexico City --Ralf Roletschek 10:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 12:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Tlatelolco, Plaza de las tres Culturas in Mexico City --Ralf Roletschek 10:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 12:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Bus in Mexico D. F. --Ralf Roletschek 10:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Decline Not sharp, sorry. --Peulle 12:46, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Bus in Mexico D. F. --Ralf Roletschek 10:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Decline Not sharp, sorry. --Peulle 12:46, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Cocktail Old Cuban --Ralf Roletschek 10:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Decline  Oppose Not quite sharply rendered, IMO, particularly on the top left of the glass. Also, the Guidelines state that: "Quality images shall have a meaningful file name (...)". This file does not. Since Ralf Roletschek does not wish to rename any of his files, I must vote to decline.--Peulle 12:52, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Cocktail Old Cuban --Ralf Roletschek 10:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Decline  Oppose Not quite sharply rendered, IMO, particularly on the top left of the glass. Also, the Guidelines state that: "Quality images shall have a meaningful file name (...)". This file does not. Since Ralf Roletschek does not wish to rename any of his files, I must vote to decline.--Peulle 12:52, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Cocktail French 75 --Ralf Roletschek 10:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Decline  Oppose The Guidelines state that: "Quality images shall have a meaningful file name (...)". This file does not. Since Ralf Roletschek does not wish to rename any of his files, I must vote to decline.--Peulle 12:52, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Cocktail French 75 --Ralf Roletschek 10:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Decline  Oppose The Guidelines state that: "Quality images shall have a meaningful file name (...)". This file does not. Since Ralf Roletschek does not wish to rename any of his files, I must vote to decline.--Peulle 12:52, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Ruinen in der Festung Küstrin --Ralf Roletschek 10:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion OK. --A.Savin 13:19, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Ruinen in der Festung Küstrin --Ralf Roletschek 10:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion OK. --A.Savin 13:19, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Santa Maria del Popolo (Rome) - Dome --Livioandronico2013 09:37, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. Geocode would have been nice. --Peulle 10:26, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Santa Maria del Popolo (Rome) - Dome --Livioandronico2013 09:37, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. Geocode would have been nice. --Peulle 10:26, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination The main altar of St.Oswald church in Baunach --Ermell 08:07, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 10:27, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination The main altar of St.Oswald church in Baunach --Ermell 08:07, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 10:27, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Main altar of the church of Maria Ward School in Bamberg --Ermell 08:07, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:31, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Main altar of the church of Maria Ward School in Bamberg --Ermell 08:07, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:31, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Chancel of the church of Maria Ward School in Bamberg --Ermell 08:07, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:40, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Chancel of the church of Maria Ward School in Bamberg --Ermell 08:07, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:40, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Track number in the old locomotive shed in Bamberg --Ermell 08:07, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:31, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Track number in the old locomotive shed in Bamberg --Ermell 08:07, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:31, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Track number in the old locomotive shed in Bamberg --Ermell 08:07, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 13:17, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Track number in the old locomotive shed in Bamberg --Ermell 08:07, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 13:17, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Shops and stalls on Maha Bandula street in Yangon --Jakubhal 08:04, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:34, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Shops and stalls on Maha Bandula street in Yangon --Jakubhal 08:04, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:34, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Zawrat Kasprowy in Tatra Mountains --Jakubhal 08:04, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. Nice image. --Peulle 12:58, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Zawrat Kasprowy in Tatra Mountains --Jakubhal 08:04, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. Nice image. --Peulle 12:58, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Mountain hiking of parking in power station Malga Mare to Lago Lungo (2553m). --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:50, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:29, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Mountain hiking of parking in power station Malga Mare to Lago Lungo (2553m).
      --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:50, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:29, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Pavilion at the lido of the Parkhotel on Hans-Pruscha-Weg #5, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:41, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:59, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Pavilion at the lido of the Parkhotel on Hans-Pruscha-Weg #5, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:41, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:59, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Reeds at the littoral zone of Lake Woerth on Hans-Pruscha-Weg, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:41, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good focus to the front --Michielverbeek 06:05, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Reeds at the littoral zone of Lake Woerth on Hans-Pruscha-Weg, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:41, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good focus to the front --Michielverbeek 06:05, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination View of the Pyramid Ballon from the park on Johannaweg, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:41, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:34, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination View of the Pyramid Ballon from the park on Johannaweg, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:41, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:34, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination View of Lake Woerth from the peninsula promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:41, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination View of Lake Woerth from the peninsula promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:41, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Hibernal rambler roses with lantern on Johannes-Brahms-Promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:41, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 08:00, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Hibernal rambler roses with lantern on Johannes-Brahms-Promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:41, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 08:00, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Banff, Alberta.Pierre5018 03:06, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Decline  Oppose I'm sorry, but the sharpness is far below QI standards. --A.Savin 13:16, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Banff, Alberta.Pierre5018 03:06, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Decline  Oppose I'm sorry, but the sharpness is far below QI standards. --A.Savin 13:16, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Loriol Castle in Confrançon. --Chabe01 00:20, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 08:02, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Loriol Castle in Confrançon. --Chabe01 00:20, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 08:02, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Building of Department of Pulmonology Diseases at Kłodzko Hospital 1 --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Building of Department of Pulmonology Diseases at Kłodzko Hospital 1 --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Building of Department of Pulmonology Diseases at Kłodzko Hospital 2 --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 13:13, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Building of Department of Pulmonology Diseases at Kłodzko Hospital 2 --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 13:13, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Building of Department of Neurology at Kłodzko Hospital 1 --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 08:02, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Building of Department of Neurology at Kłodzko Hospital 1 --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 08:02, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Building of Department of Neurology at Kłodzko Hospital 3 --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:35, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Building of Department of Neurology at Kłodzko Hospital 3 --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:35, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Kouroutes cemetary, Crete. --C messier 12:56, 13 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion OK. --A.Savin 13:12, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Kouroutes cemetary, Crete. --C messier 12:56, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion OK. --A.Savin 13:12, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Julia Taubitz beim HELABA Nationscup der Damen in Oberhof 2017 --Sandro Halank 18:10, 13 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 16:48, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Julia Taubitz beim HELABA Nationscup der Damen in Oberhof 2017 --Sandro Halank 18:10, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 16:48, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Abbaye Sainte-Foy de Conques, Aveyron, France --Tournasol7 18:00, 13 March 2017 (UTC) * Decline  Comment Tilted to the right and overexposed. Fixable if you have the raw. --C messier 13:38, 13 March 2017 (UTC) It's better? Tournasol7 21:52, 13 March 2017 (UTC) Comment I'm afraid no. The brighter parts still show little detail. --C messier 13:16, 13 March 2017 (UTC) I changed, but I haven't RAW, so IMO I can't make better...Tournasol7 23:23, 13 March 2017 (UTC)  Oppose Withouth the raw, the highlights can't be fixed. --C messier 12:01, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Abbaye Sainte-Foy de Conques, Aveyron, France --Tournasol7 18:00, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Decline  Comment Tilted to the right and overexposed. Fixable if you have the raw. --C messier 13:38, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
      It's better? Tournasol7 21:52, 13 March 2017 (UTC) Comment I'm afraid no. The brighter parts still show little detail. --C messier 13:16, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
      I changed, but I haven't RAW, so IMO I can't make better...Tournasol7 23:23, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
       Oppose Withouth the raw, the highlights can't be fixed. --C messier 12:01, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Abbaye Sainte-Foy de Conques, Aveyron, France --Tournasol7 18:00, 13 March 2017 (UTC) Can you please reduce the highlights? It can also use a bit of contrast Poco a poco 22:40, 13 March 2017 (UTC) I corrected, but I'm not sure that is better. I always see highlights... It's not RAW... Much worse now, the WB is definitely wrong, I wouldn't the colors/white balance but reduce brightness overall of the first version. No RAW? Buf, then you will be here in trouble... Poco a poco 19:43, 14 March 2017 (UTC) It's a pity... Have to be rejected. Tournasol7 19:49, 14 March 2017 (UTC) * Decline
    • Nomination Abbaye Sainte-Foy de Conques, Aveyron, France --Tournasol7 18:00, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
      Can you please reduce the highlights? It can also use a bit of contrast Poco a poco 22:40, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
      I corrected, but I'm not sure that is better. I always see highlights... It's not RAW...
      Much worse now, the WB is definitely wrong, I wouldn't the colors/white balance but reduce brightness overall of the first version. No RAW? Buf, then you will be here in trouble... Poco a poco 19:43, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
      It's a pity... Have to be rejected. Tournasol7 19:49, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Decline
  • * Nomination Rethymno municipal garden, Crete. --C messier 13:39, 13 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion There is a CA on the branches/tigs, could you remove it, please? --Basotxerri 18:55, 13 March 2017 (UTC) Done --C messier 13:22, 13 March 2017 (UTC) Thank you! Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:14, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Rethymno municipal garden, Crete. --C messier 13:39, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion There is a CA on the branches/tigs, could you remove it, please? --Basotxerri 18:55, 13 March 2017 (UTC)✓ Done --C messier 13:22, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
      Thank you! Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:14, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Another view of Joe Creek in Canada's Ivvavik National Park --Daniel Case 06:09, 13 March 2017 (UTC) --A.Savin 15:06, 13 March 2017 (UTC)  Done Got rid of the spot, whatever it was, and as for the tilt I fixed it but do see my comment on the other image. Daniel Case 18:28, 13 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Who stole my comment? OK for QI. --A.Savin 13:09, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Another view of Joe Creek in Canada's Ivvavik National Park --Daniel Case 06:09, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
      --A.Savin 15:06, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
      ✓ Done Got rid of the spot, whatever it was, and as for the tilt I fixed it but do see my comment on the other image. Daniel Case 18:28, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Who stole my comment? OK for QI. --A.Savin 13:09, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination South view of the skerries in Risør, Norway.--Peulle 20:50, 12 March 2017 (UTC) * Withdrawn Is it just me or isn't the horizon a bit tilted? It's hard to see with that blown sky to the right. Any chance of fixing this? --W.carter 17:21, 14 March 2017 (UTC) Comment You're right, it's definitely a problem. However, it's not a tilt but some kind of lens distortion. I've tried fixing it but to no avail. Thanks for your review.--Peulle 20:36, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination South view of the skerries in Risør, Norway.--Peulle 20:50, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • Withdrawn Is it just me or isn't the horizon a bit tilted? It's hard to see with that blown sky to the right. Any chance of fixing this? --W.carter 17:21, 14 March 2017 (UTC) Comment You're right, it's definitely a problem. However, it's not a tilt but some kind of lens distortion. I've tried fixing it but to no avail. Thanks for your review.--Peulle 20:36, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • * Nomination Water tap at the Olarizu Allotments. Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain; taken with a Yashica 50mm f/1.9 vintage lens @ 1.9 --Basotxerri 19:02, 11 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. Not very sharp either ;-) --Moroder 15:49, 14 March 2017 (UTC)  Comment I admit that the 2.8 version was sharper. Thanks for the review! --Basotxerri 17:54, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Water tap at the Olarizu Allotments. Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain; taken with a Yashica 50mm f/1.9 vintage lens @ 1.9 --Basotxerri 19:02, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. Not very sharp either ;-) --Moroder 15:49, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
       Comment I admit that the 2.8 version was sharper. Thanks for the review! --Basotxerri 17:54, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Gates at San Clemente High School, Mayfield. Adamdaley 04:55, 11 March 2017 (UTC) Needs to be turned ccw and and sharpened a bit.--Ermell 07:52, 11 March 2017 (UTC) Comment Has been sharpened but not straightened. Adamdaley 08:09, 11 March 2017 (UTC)  Comment I've tried to straighten the image. Does it look straight? Adamdaley 08:23, 11 March 2017 (UTC) Comment The verticals on the left are o.k but not on the right side--Ermell 13:33, 11 March 2017 (UTC)  Comment i don't know how to fix the verticals. Adamdaley 14:17, 11 March 2017 (UTC)  Comment Tilt and perspective corrected, some glare reduced. Ready for review. --W.carter 20:16, 13 March 2017 (UTC) * Promotion There may be a little camera shake due to the relatively long shutter time. A slightly larger aperture, like f/9 instead of f/11 would have permitted a shorter shutter time while maintaining a good depth of field. But good enough for QI :D --Slaunger 22:49, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Gates at San Clemente High School, Mayfield. Adamdaley 04:55, 11 March 2017 (UTC) Needs to be turned ccw and and sharpened a bit.--Ermell 07:52, 11 March 2017 (UTC) Comment Has been sharpened but not straightened. Adamdaley 08:09, 11 March 2017 (UTC)  Comment I've tried to straighten the image. Does it look straight? Adamdaley 08:23, 11 March 2017 (UTC) Comment The verticals on the left are o.k but not on the right side--Ermell 13:33, 11 March 2017 (UTC)  Comment i don't know how to fix the verticals. Adamdaley 14:17, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
       Comment Tilt and perspective corrected, some glare reduced. Ready for review. --W.carter 20:16, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion There may be a little camera shake due to the relatively long shutter time. A slightly larger aperture, like f/9 instead of f/11 would have permitted a shorter shutter time while maintaining a good depth of field. But good enough for QI :D --Slaunger 22:49, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Consensual review[edit]

File:Travellers at Wedding Cake Rock, December 2014.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Travellers interacting with Wedding Cake Rock in the Royal National Park. (Renomination, sharper version) PhilipTerryGraham 04:41, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline Please don´t nominate already declined photograps again. Thank you for your understanding. --Ermell 08:21, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
    •  Comment If an image has been significantly improved since the previous attempt, there should be no reason why it cannot be renominated. I will move these to the CR section in case Ermell doesn't see it.--Peulle 11:26, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
      •  Comment Sorry, my fault. I didn´t notice that the images have been significantly improved.--Ermell 15:15, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I'm opposed; it's difficult to get a photo good enough using a mobile phone camera and it has not succeeded here, IMO. The faces (especially the person in the middle) are not sharp or clear, and there are compression artifacts all over the image.--Peulle 09:37, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 11:17, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Wedding Cake Rock and the White Cliffs, December 2014.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination View of the White Cliffs from Wedding Cake Rock, in the Royal National Park. (Renomination, sharper version) PhilipTerryGraham 04:41, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline Please don´t nominate already declined photograps again.Thank you. --Ermell 08:19, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
    •  Comment @Ermell: is there a procedure to getting images renominated for QI? Surely they must... it can't be just one time and that's it, especially when the image has been improved to the request of the previous commentator... PhilipTerryGraham 09:04, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
      •  Comment If an image has been significantly improved since the previous attempt, there should be no reason why it cannot be renominated. I will move these to the CR section in case Ermell doesn't see it.--Peulle 11:26, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
        •  Comment Sorry, my fault. I didn´t notice that the images have been significantly improved--Ermell 15:18, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Same as the other one; I don't think the image itself is good enough for QI standard, the faces are not sharp or clear, and there are compression artifacts all over the image.--Peulle 09:39, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 11:16, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Chiesa del Redentore isola Giudecca Venezia.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Facade of the Il Redentore in Venice at sunset --Moroder 13:47, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Unsharp, noisy, and has perspective issues --Daniel Case 06:06, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
  • I disagree on noise and sharpness, ✓ Done fixed perspective --Moroder 14:39, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for me. --Basotxerri 21:20, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support from me; losing sharpness on the right side but otherwise I think it's OK.--Peulle (talk) 09:42, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 11:18, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Giudecca_Palazzo_Mocenigo_Fondamenta_San_Giovanni_Venezia.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Palazzo Mocenigo on Fondamenta San Giovanni on the Giudecca island in Venice --Moroder 19:44, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Unsharp in the middle and at the left --A.Savin 01:04, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
I don't see why having a 36 MB camera puts me in the position to elevate te QI standard of my pictures way above the average --Moroder 15:49, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
 Comment Excellent response, Moroder! Definitely it's time to rename COM:Image guidelines into COM:Image guidelines for photos taken with cameras with a resolution of less than 36 megapixels. LOL --A.Savin 16:05, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
 Comment Please Savin , don't be silly. What I am saying that reviewers should look at the pictures and not at the cameras they were taken with and that they should be evaluated according to an average standard of Quality --Moroder 19:15, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
 Comment @Moroder: Maybe you should admit that the reason why you are corrupting my username and insulting me as silly, is that you don't have any further arguments on the issue. Erbärmlich... --A.Savin 23:53, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
 Comment I' never think of insulting anyone here, but your irony is silly--Moroder 05:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
btw I'm just calling you by your last name, what's wrong with it? If you are offended please pardon me.--Moroder 05:23, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment @Moroder: Here's how I think the guidelines see it: as technology improves, the bar for image quality is steadily moved upwards over time. Logically, a camera with 2016 technology can take better images than a camera from 1995, and a 36 Mpx camera shoots better than a 7 Mpx camera. Why then do the QIC requirements increase over time? It's a stimulus: trying to encourage people to upload quality images, better and better as technology improves. If we set the standard at year 2000 technology, I would easily be able to shoot great images using 2016 technology. Commons want their contributors to shoot the best images possible, so we'll have to evaluate each image according to the technology used to shoot it. :) --Peulle 17:02, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Well than A. Savin is right with his irony that new guidelines should be set for the use of different technology. Cheers --Moroder 18:41, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Qi is not a forum to find out who owns the better camera equipment and it is not a lens test forum. In my opinion, the point here is to promote decently photographed pictures, which have no avoidable technical errors. Most of the available lenses are not capable of displaying sharp images with these cameras with 36 or 50 MPixeln resolution (or 16 to 24 MP pixels with aps-c). Thus, it is inevitable that images from such cameras can look more blurred when pixel peeping than images from cameras with a lower sensor resolution. These sensors also show the weaknesses of a lens, which are simply not visible at lower resolution sensors. My wide angle zoom was rather great on my old 6-Mpixel camera, but using it at 16 or 24 Mpixels (APS-C) is quite unsatisfying, so I need to scale down to six to eight MPixels. --Smial 09:25, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
This is absurd! Look at Poco a poco's photos for example: 50 megapixels, taken with usual zoom lenses, and nonetheless most are sharp, much crisper than this one. Having a high-res camera is not an excuse for poor focusing. --A.Savin 12:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Yes, you are right, I'm wrong and a moron. Farewell. --Smial 19:21, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • So are you using a new lens with an old camera, so that the sensor cannot handle the lens? I had the reverse problem; my camera was too good for the lens so I had to upgrade. The questions in QIC I guess is which piece of tech to judge from. Clearly, we decline many mobile phone photos because they're not good enough, so it's the photo itself and not just the camera it was shot with that counts.--Peulle 09:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment It's a 1700 Euro Nikon lens and IMHO the settings and focus for this picture are perfect.--Moroder 11:05, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • No. I'm using a lens introduced in 2005, used it on a camera from 2004 with 6 MPixels. It was quite nice then. Today I own a camera with 16 MPixels. The enhanced sensor resolution now shows errors, which were not visible in the old camera. No, the lens is not defective, on the old body it still works fine. If you have a look at dxomark you can find many lenses from many manufacturors that are not sharp enough for 36 Mpixles or 50 MPixels. --Smial 12:27, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough in 100% view. 100% with that camera equals 200% view (also called "pixel peeping") compared to "six-Mpixel-are-always-enough-images" and 400% view compared to the minimum required resolution of 2 MPix. --Smial 09:11, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for me. About the discussion: I understand Moroder's frustration because I admit that I normally look at the pictures at 100% view and it's much more probable to see unsharpness at this resolution. However, there are images that are really unsharp because the focus wasn't the right (or the image motion-blurred or whatever). Some way we'll need to learn how to differentiate both. --Basotxerri 20:56, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support per Smial and Basotxerri. Looks fine at 100%. Sharpness isn't a problem in my opinion - you can even clearly read the text on the side of the boat, the sharpness is that suprisingly good for a 7360px wide image. -- Philip Terry Graham (talk) 09:09, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 11:18, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Quality_images_candidates/Archives_March_17_2017&oldid=837091222"