Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 05 2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Kazah_Jurt.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination казахская юрта в юртах --Alexandr frolov 20:32, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment The sky is a bit too noisy. Can you fix it? --Tournasol7 23:39, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not more than five a day --Michielverbeek 07:35, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose More than five nominations a day. --Basotxerri 16:30, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   Not eligible. --Peulle 14:08, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

File:2019_Mercedes-Benz_E220d_SE_Automatic_2.0_Front.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination 2019 Mercedes-Benz E220d SE Automatic 2.0 Front Taken in Warwick --Vauxford 21:04, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose not that sharp --MB-one 16:11, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment MB-one Where about is it that isn't sharp? I can make it slightly sharper if that helps? --Vauxford 18:01, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
    The details in the grill are hard to see. I'm not sure if sharpening will help, but you can certainly try --MB-one 18:29, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done MB-one How this? --Vauxford 18:48, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support - Good enough quality for me. -- Ikan Kekek 07:52, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - Verticals are not well done; background is hanging to the right --Michielverbeek 19:44, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Michielverbeek--Fischer.H 18:15, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sharp enough on the car, but walls in the background leaning too much. --Johannes Robalotoff 13:33, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 14:07, 4 March 2019 (UTC)