Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 03 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Narcissus_Jonquilla_Pueblo.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Narcissus Jonquilla Pueblo mini daffodil at sunset --EoRdE6 16:39, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Not the worsed compo but too unsharp --Ermell 21:19, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment hate doing this but I understand the complaint just think it still far surpasses QI standards (though my display is historically bad at helping with this) EoRdE6 21:51, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - Pretty photo, but QI does have higher standards for sharpness than this, in my opinion. Nothing in this picture is sharp. -- Ikan Kekek 22:45, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per others. I too have had some of my photos of similar quality/sharpness declined, so I think it's fairly consistent.--Peulle 12:02, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 01:31, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Biswas_Ras_Mancha.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination: Ras Mancha near the Biswas Bari of Cossipore. By User:DeepanjanGhosh --Sumitsurai 11:25, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Comment Needs some perspective correction. --A.Savin 16:15, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:55, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose for now -A.Savin 01:43, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --A.Savin 01:30, 3 March 2017 (UTC)