Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 27 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:16-06-21-Eberswalde-RalfR-WP_20160621_16_55_57_Pro.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination sculpture by Paul Wunderlich, Eberswalde --Ralf Roletschek 19:54, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality -- Spurzem 20:58, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree: There is posterization in the sky. --Cccefalon 21:17, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
 Comment There is an affiliated thread about this series of smartphone photos: on my talk page (in german language) --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 08:01, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support You shot this with a Lumia? It's really not bad. Since the sculptures are the subject, I feel the general quality outweighs the sky problems. If you wish to please Cccefalon, I suppose you could crop out the sky entirely. --Peulle 12:57, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
    •  Info New version uploaded. Yes, the EXIF are authentic, it's from a Lumia. --Ralf Roletschek 15:22, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support I agree in this case. To me its still ok for a QI. -- DerFussi 05:05, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Fine 4 me. --Palauenc05 10:54, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose A QI must be categorized at a relevant level. This is not the case, therefore the label should be useless, nobody could fing the picture in the "Commons" collection. Please make an effort.--Jebulon 20:21, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Palauenc05 10:54, 24 June 2016 (UTC)