Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 19 2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Iris_sibirica_TK_2021-05-29_6.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Iris sibirica, Hrachoviště, Czechia --Nefronus 14:09, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Peulle 14:22, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Some part is out of focus --Commonists 16:38, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support I think enough is in focus at a big enough size. -- Ikan Kekek 06:05, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support by Ikan Kekek. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 16:55, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support It is not easy to get more of the flowers in focus at this distance; the selective DoF has been handled very well. --Aristeas 08:34, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 19:15, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

File:AUT_vs._TUR_2016-03-29_(180).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Alper Boğuşlu, goalkeepercoach of Turkey --Steindy 21:12, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Cut on the left. --Nefronus 13:52, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Isn't a problem for me --Commonists 16:41, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not a problem? A portrait with a cropped ear is not a problem? This is clearly a missed aim.--Peulle (talk) 06:34, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Not a studio shot, therefore by far good enough for QIC. The photo shows very impressively the tension or high attention of this trainer. There I consider a (little bit) cut ear irrelevant. --Smial 14:29, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Just for  Info: 1. All my photos are live recordings, would not be possible otherwise in a soccer match. So I only have a fraction of a second to take a picture and I can't face the people as I want. 2. I hardly ever do any post-processing (except for the image size and section), including no white balance. In a soccer game with 1000 or 1500 photos, this would not be possible due to time constraints. 3. I don't have Photoshop, just an old version of PaintShop. And last but not least: These were just attempts. It remains to be seen whether I will continue. Regards --Steindy 17:02, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose by Nefronus + Peulle. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 16:59, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per above and photographs of the players seem to have been taken properly. Rodhullandemu 07:11, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 19:14, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Saarburg_Höhenmarke_St_Laurentius.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Benchmark of Königlich Preußische Landesaufnahme at Saint Laurentius Church in Saarburg, Germany. --Palauenc05 10:47, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment Quite noisy for me, sorry. --Nefronus 06:04, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
  • I disagree, there is no noise at all. This is exactly what the surface of this cast iron object looks like when the photo is greatly enlarged. The benchmark is about 12 cm in diameter. --Palauenc05 08:14, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good to me. --JiriMatejicek 08:40, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Weak support Well, then I take my negative vote back. Nefronus 14:21, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support --Aristeas 08:29, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 19:12, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Stones_on_Via_dell'Abbondanza_(Pompeii).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Stones on Via dell'Abbondanza (Pompeii) --Commonists 18:23, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Sharpening/jpg artifacts on the left stone, sorry. --Nefronus 23:21, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Others please--Commonists 07:07, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Zoomed to 400% you can find some artifacts, that possibly could be sharpening artifacts. Or something else. On the other hand this is a magnification you could print this image about three meters wide at 300 dpi, before this problem is visible. --Smial 21:56, 14 June 2021 (UTC) (keine Ahnung, was das passende englische Gegenstück zu "die Kirche im Dorf lassen" wäre)
  •  Support Zoomed to 400%? Don't exaggerate! ;-) --Moroder 10:58, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 19:11, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Castle_of_Annecy_07.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Castle of Annecy, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 05:59, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 08:07, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
    It looks like you added light blue to the sky afterwards. The tower was coloured as well. Can you fix that? --Ermell 08:11, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
    ✓ New version uploaded, Tournasol7 05:44, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
    Not better. How about masking the tower? --Ermell 21:32, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
    So I withdraw this image. Tournasol7 06:20, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support I don't see any reason to withdraw --Moroder 20:33, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    So let's discuss about. --Tournasol7 11:07, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality --Steindy 23:38, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 19:10, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Eichelhäher_IMG_2835.jpg[edit]

 I withdraw my nomination. --Fischer.H 17:23, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:58, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]